tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post3363263556109407809..comments2023-10-18T03:22:50.455-07:00Comments on truthjihad.com blog: Does Honey-Trap Smear Suggest WikiLeaks is for Real?Kevin Barretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16674471854209420488noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-76673739251861554032010-10-01T04:51:55.207-07:002010-10-01T04:51:55.207-07:00Fetzer has done quite a lot in exposing the Govern...Fetzer has done quite a lot in exposing the Government, the Bush administration, the senator Paul Wellstone assassination and showing how the ruling elites manipulate or even corrupt institutions like NIST and even the NTSB. He has done it so comprehensively and giving a level of detail that could even be used in a court or before a Grand Jury, so how is is contributions supposed to provide something positive working _for_ the elites and make him a "fake left" "pseudo truther"? I had no belief in mini-nukes back in 2006 but understood 911 was controlled demolition, but after going through the data and the evidence, I'm not ruling out nuclear demolition. And btw, the speeds and impacts involved on the towers does not make it plausible that any 757 or commercial airplanes were involved. Does that make me a "kook" or a "nutcase"? I have some university education and I consider that I fully comprehend laws of physics and scientific method, but yeah, smears work. But should we waste much time on it? As to Julian Assange, I have never heard him say anything comprehensive political. No support for 911 truth, no serious criticism of anything political. I heard a 20 minute BBC worldservice interview with him, but it was so bland and boring that I had trouble remembering if he said anything of consequence... I don't know, but I'm of the opinion that you need to have some serious views, some serious goals, you need to state them, and you need to state what you think is _wrong_ with things around in this world if you're at all serious about doing anything about anything. Or helping anyone else or a movement in effecting anything of consequence that can lead to any serious change. I just dont get all the smearing that's so abundant in the truth movement. Care to explain some / any of it? Yes I think Israeli elites and Mossad are in cahoots with US security services and british security "services". But I do not think that everyone who does not understand the israel connection are automatically "fake" truthers. I do think they have been brainwashed to be really afraid of critizising Israel and Jews because of the "Holocaust". Almost everyone have been brainwashed to think that. But people avoiding the Israel issue and involvement are beginning to have problems and I hope that continues. A lot if not most of internal squabble in movements can be put down to human stupidity, pride and just pure stubbornness and lack of social skills in debate, but yes, of course, the FBI and the government have a century old history of infiltrating and disrupting all popular movements. I just don't think the current level of internal accusations are completely justified...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-21755503237049611392010-09-30T06:29:00.452-07:002010-09-30T06:29:00.452-07:00Don't know about Mizel, but I think Lenny is h...Don't know about Mizel, but I think Lenny is honest. <br /><br />I question the premise of Bollyn, certain folks at Rediscover911, etc. that anyone who isn't pointing a finger at the Zionists is slowing down the emergence of truth. There is room for those who aren't pointing fingers as well as for those who are.<br /><br />It's those who try to "disable" the "purveyors of (true) conspiracy theories" about the Zionists who are acting out Sunstein's script. I've never seen Lenny try to disable anyone, quite the contrary.Kevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16674471854209420488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-63156737526393456352010-09-29T17:42:53.972-07:002010-09-29T17:42:53.972-07:00Might Lenny Charles be a pseudo-truther?
What do ...Might Lenny Charles be a pseudo-truther?<br /><br />What do you make of this,from Christopher Bollyn's site?<br /><br />"The key point is that the devoted Zionist agent Steven M. Mizel is the owner and power behind the scenes at I.N.N. and the Walker Stage. Lenny Charles' 9-11 conference is just another Zionist effort to hijack the memory of 9-11 by misinterpreting the false-flag terror atrocity that changed the world without asking who really did it or discussing the evidence of Israeli/Zionist involvement."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-13277495638490901912010-09-23T18:50:59.109-07:002010-09-23T18:50:59.109-07:00I'm just trying to keep an open mind as I figu...I'm just trying to keep an open mind as I figure these things out. Gordon Duff and Israel Shamir are both brilliant and fearless, and both (like me and everyone else) may not get everything right. As far as I'm concerned the jury's still out on this one.Kevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16674471854209420488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-76002137413455185852010-09-23T16:42:36.344-07:002010-09-23T16:42:36.344-07:00You are a fine speaker and writer, Kevin. Keep up ...You are a fine speaker and writer, Kevin. Keep up the good work,we really appreciate it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-77035823680011895122010-09-23T11:07:00.331-07:002010-09-23T11:07:00.331-07:00Hi Kevin, while Gordon Duff does not seem a leftis...Hi Kevin, while Gordon Duff does not seem a leftist to me, his article you quoted, like many others by him, make a lot of sense.<br />It is sufficient to note that Assange is a 9/11 truth-denier, that nobody knows who is funding him, that wikileaks published just stuff already known worldwide from 10 years mixed with b/s (like reports about hunting Bin Laden) to see that wikileaks smells fishy big time. I appreciate both your articles and Duff's ones, and I do not see any contradiction between your thesis up to now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2492007072400883438.post-12809440306643326942010-09-23T10:56:24.790-07:002010-09-23T10:56:24.790-07:00Gordon Duff (whose articles I do publish) is by hi...Gordon Duff (whose articles I do publish) is by his own admission a close friend and associate of the former head of ISI, Pak Security Service. So his opinions in relation to Pakistan are of little value, in my view.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12312935176458479858noreply@blogger.com