If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Jim Marrs: Are JFK & 9/11 conspiracies symptoms of something bigger?

Tuesday, April 30th, 11 a.m. to noon Central (9-10 Pacific) on NoLiesRadio.org (then archived here a few hours after broadcast).

Jim Marrs is the only "conspiracy" author whose works are regularly issued by a major publisher and reviewed by the New York Times. Marrs is noted for Crossfire, the basis for Oliver Stone's film JFK, and The Terror Conspiracy: 9/11 and the Loss of Liberty. His latest, Our Occulted History: Do the Global Elite Conceal Ancient Aliens? picks up where Rule by Secrecy left off, exploring various permutations of Zecharia Sitchin's thesis that modern humans were genetically engineered by ancient aliens. Marrs suspects that a rear-guard of those ancient aliens, a faction of "trouble-makers," remained on earth after some sort of inter-alien conflict, and has been preserving its elite bloodline while controlling the rest of us ever since.

Interestingly, the New York Times gave Our Occulted History a favorable review, along with a warning to "steer clear" of exposing the genocidal big lies of Zionism OR ELSE:

"His works continue to sell successfully, and provided he steers clear of certain raw-nerve topics he is confident he will be able to keep doing what he does." 

But that hasn't stopped Marrs from talking about the Rothschilds and the Federal Reserve bankster cartel.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

CIA’s Graham Fuller, connected to Tsarnaevs, ran 9/11 cover-up in Turkey




The Tsarnaev brothers' intel-connected uncle married the daughter of CIA spook Graham Fuller - who led the 9/11 cover-up in Turkey. Small world!

Read the full story

WTC “Boeing landing gear”: Lamest planted evidence ever?

When the 9/11 perps lowered a piece of Boeing landing gear by ropes into the narrow space behind the "Ground Zero Mosque," they may have set a new record for obviousness in the planting of bogus "evidence."

(read the full story)

Friday, April 26, 2013

The Brothers Tsarnaev: The Lee Harvey Oswalds of the Boston bombings

Veterans Today

A speaker of Russian, he traveled to Russia and back on ultra-sensitive missions – supposedly without any spy services noticing. Yet it turns out that he was followed for years by the FBI! Framed for a murderous crime on a crowded street, exonerated by crime scene photographs, declared innocent by loved ones and by all who knew him, caught by police after being framed for “murdering a police officer,” gunned down by agents of the National Security State after his arrest to prevent him from proclaiming his innocence in court…haven’t we heard this story before? Are we talking about Lee Harvey Oswald – or the Brothers Tsarnaev?

* * * 

Fifty years ago, Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Today, the same National Security State that killed JFK still rules America, using the same tools of murder and deception. And it appears to have set up two “Oswalds” Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to take the blame for the Boston Marathon bombings.

The parallels between Oswald and the brothers Tsarnaev are uncanny.

First parallel: All three have been exonerated by crime scene photographs.

Eyewitness testimony established that Oswald must have been on or near the ground floor of the Texas Book Depository not the sixth floor “sniper’s nest” when JFK was shot. This testimony is supported by a picture of Oswald standing in the street outside the Depository as the presidential motorcade goes by.


Expert photographic analysis has revealed that the figure in this picture is Oswald, not Lovelady, as JFK assassination expert Dr. James Fetzer explains in his article “JFK Special: Oswald was in the Doorway, after all!

The photographic record of the JFK assassination, like that of the Boston bombings, not only exonerates the patsy, but reveals who really committed the crime.

Photographic evidence places Edward Lansdale, America’s top political assassinations specialist, and CIA agent and future president George H.W. Bush standing in front of the Texas School Book Depository running the JFK assassination. This evidence is discussed in the article “Did George H.W. Bush Coordinate a CIA Hit Team?” by Richard Hooke and James Fetzer.



Photographs of the Boston bombing similarly exonerate Dzokhar Tsarnaev, who is seen in this photograph leaving after the bombing with his backpack still on.



If Dzokhar Tsarnaev was framed, that means that his brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was also framed.

Crime scene photographs show us who really planted the bombs. The bomber was a member of a paramilitary operative team wearing black caps with identical skull logos. The photo below shows the bomber fleeing the crime scene without his backpack. That backpack has a white square on top. The paramilitary bomber is the only person in any of the photos with a backpack featuring that white square.


Here is the same backpack after the explosion.


So the Brothers Tsarnaev, like Lee Harvey Oswald, are innocent patsies. But Oswald, unlike the Brothers Tsarnaev, was able to speak for himself. After his arrest, and before being gunned down in the Dallas Police Department basement by CIA-linked mob hit-man Jack Ruby, Oswald said: “I’m a patsy.”

The Brothers Tsarnaev may never be allowed to speak in their own defense; fifty years after Oswald’s “I’m a patsy,” the National Security State appears to have learned that lesson well. Indeed, the Israeli doctors tasked with treating Dzokhar Tsarnaev in the hospital reported that “he may never speak again.” (Why were Israeli doctors assigned an American national security case? Perhaps for the same reason that an Israeli team of terror specialists flew to Boston, on a trip organized before the bombing, to take charge of the “investigation.” After all, Israel is the global “A Team” of false-flag terrorism.)

Dzokhar Tsarnaev did speak out, in a way, in his own defense by endorsing 9/11 truth before he was framed for the bombing. Using his Twitter account, he wrote: “Idk why it’s hard for many of you to accept that 9/11 was an inside job.” That tweet, like Oswald’s “I’m a patsy,” may go down in history. It strongly suggests Dzokhar’s innocence. (Why would any Muslim who knew 9/11 was an inside job as 80% of Muslims do, according to polls want to commit terrorism whose only beneficiaries are Zionists and imperialists?)

Though the Brothers Tsarnaev will not be allowed to defend themselves, their loved ones are doing it for them. Their mother, father, and aunt all say they are innocent patsies, framed by agents of the National Security state.

Oswald’s girlfriend, Judith Vary Baker, has similarly exonerated Oswald.  

Listen to my interview with Judith Vary Baker.

Another Tsarnaev-Oswald parallel: They were Russian speakers who were shadowed for years by the FBI before being framed for a spectacular crime.

Oswald was not only shadowed by the FBI, he was actually reporting to the FBI on a regular basis during the years between his return from Russia in 1961 and his murder on November 24th, 1963.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his parents tell us, was shadowed for years by the FBI before being set up as the patsy in the Boston Marathon bombings.

The FBI, we may recall, is the agency developed by arch-criminal J.Edgar Hoover as America’s gestapo. Though most low-level FBI agents are honest, the higher-ups are psychopathic criminals mobsters with badges.

The FBI organized the plot and built the bomb that devastated the World Trade Center in 1993. FBI informant Emad Salem, who hatched the plot and delivered the bomb as part of his FBI duties, secretly recorded a conversation with his FBI handler protesting about how the FBI delivered a real bomb, not a dummy bomb as promised.

It is well known, even among mainstream scholars, that the FBI has organized virtually every “Muslim terrorist” incident of the past decade. As Judge Napolitano admitted on Fox TV, the FBI has been involved in at least 17 false-flag plots to attack America since 9/11.

Another uncanny parallel between Lee Harvey Oswald and Tamerlan Tsarnaev is that both were earmarked “enemies” (Tsarnaev a “radical Muslim,” Oswald a “communist”) who traveled to Russia on mysterious errands and both, according to official pronouncements, managed to pass completely undetected by the national security apparatus of both nations! In reality, both were being run by US federal agencies Oswald to feed top secret U2 data to the Russians to make the fake U2 shootdown plausible and destroy Eisenhower’s detente; and Tsarnaev to interface with CIA-Mossad assets in the “Chechen al-Qaeda community.”

Al-Qaeda-linked radical Muslims” in Chechnya are allies, not enemies, of the US. Their “terrorism” is entirely directed at Russia, and they are armed, trained, and sent on their missions by the US government. As I wrote in a recent article, the correct translation of “al-Qaeda” is “The CIA Database.”

So if Dzokhar Tsarnaev was a terrorist which seems unlikely he was part of a group controlled by US government agencies. But it seems much more probable that Tsarnaev was an Oswald-style patsy: A pawn on the grand chessboard who was deemed expendable, arrested, and then murdered to keep him from talking.

Like Oswald, who was murdered in the Dallas police station while in custody, it appears that both Tsarnaev brothers were in perfectly good health when they were arrested and then were shot after their arrests. Dzokhar Tsarnaev’s aunt has positively identified Dzokhar as the “naked man” arrested by Boston police, uninjured and in perfectly good health. And helicopter videos show Dzhokhar Tsarnaev looking healthy and uninjured as he climbs out of the boat he was hiding in. (The government says he was critically wounded but look at the images yourself and decide.

Bottom line: The US National Security State and its Israeli handlers not the Brothers Tsarnaev is the real perpetrator of the Boston bombings…and the real enemy of the American people. The complete lockdown of Boston, which removed eyewitnesses from the streets and allowed the frame-ups and shootings of the Brothers Tsarnaev, is a taste of the kind of martial law and draconian repression that is in store for the American people if they do not rise up in rebellion against the criminals posing as their guardians.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

At America's Worst News Source, Morons Drool and Call Smart People Names

Yahoos run amok because some professor's smarter than they are.
At Yahoo News (news for yahoos*?) the latest headline reads:

At America’s worst university, a professor calls Boston Bombings ‘mass casualty drill’

The story, by some yahoo named Eric, is a low-grade psy-op designed to pressure Florida Atlantic University into harassing professor James Tracy. "Jeez! Dr. Tracy is bad for business! If he keeps posting this stuff on his blog, people with cockroach-level IQs won't want to send their kids here!"

The perpetrators, and their media cover-up team, don't like James Tracy's excellent analysis of the mass casualty drill in Boston.

Duh...us yahoos no want ar kidz go skool in plase lik thatt!

*Yahoos, a term coined by Jonathan Swift, are bestial subhuman morons who spend their time grunting and throwing feces at each other...kind of like the author and many commenters on the Yahoo news hit piece.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Israeli False-Flaggers Flown in for Boston Shoot-Out?


Check out my new article on the Boston bombings:

Israeli False-Flaggers Flown in for Boston Shoot-Out?

Update: Wayne Madsen weighs in:

April 19-21, 2013 -- Boston marathon bombers tied to Chechnya

The Chechen origin and reported military training of the two suspect brothers in the Boston Marathon bombing, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsaraev, raises some pointed questions about past U.S. support for the Chechen insurgency and who sponsored the brothers to live in the United States, paid for their college tuition, receive military training abroad, and paid for Tamerlan’s Wai Kru martial arts training in Boston. There are conflicting reports on when the two brothers first arrived in the United States. Some say it was in 2002 while others claim it was in 2011.

It is known that the late Russian-Israeli tycoon Boris Berezovsky, as well as non-governmental organizations associated with the Open Society Institute of George Soros, have provided financial and logistical assistance to Chechen exiles, some of whom have been associated with Doka Umarov, the self-appointed head of the Caucasian Emirate who calls himself “Emir of the Caucasus Emirate Abu-Usman.” Dukaev’s group has claimed responsibility for a number of terrorist bombings in Russia, including those of a high speed Moscow-St. Petersburg train, Domodedovo International Airport, and Moscow Metro stations.

The Chechen secessionist cause also received support from the regime of Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili. Arizona Republican Senator John McCain has been a leading defender of the Chechen separatists and has been vehement in denials that the Chechen movement has been infiltrated by Islamist radicals and members of Al Qaeda. McCain was also a major supporter of Libyan rebels allied with Al Qaeda and he currently supports Syrian rebels who sympathize with Al Qaeda groups.

Chechen Republic President Ramzan Kadyrov, whose name was reportedly placed on a classified portion of the U.S. Magnitsky List that bars certain Russian citizens from entry into the United States, stated that the Tsarnaev brothers had no connection to the Chechen Republic and that the family’s connections to the region dated back many years ago. In fact, some reports suggested that the father was an ethnic Russian who worked in Chechnya for a number of years.Kadyrov suggested that investigators look closely at the latter years of the brothers' lives and where they received their support rather than their younger years in Dagestan and Kyrgyzstan. There are also reports that the two brothers emigrated to the United States from Kazakhstan and Turkey.

Kadyrov’s office confirmed the Tsarnaev family spent time as refugees in Kazakhstan. The Chechen President’s press office spelled the name of the family “Tsornayev.” Other reports claimed the Tsarnaev family left Dagestan in 2002. Reporters have interviewed the brothers' father, Anzor Tsaraev, in Makhachkala, the capital of Dagestan.

It is after 2002 that the story becomes murky. Some reports claim the Chechen brothers emigrated to the United States while others claim they did not arrive until 2011. However, Dzhokhar received a competitive scholarship from the city of Cambridge in 2011, an indication that he had already been in the United States for some time before 2011.

A Youtube account in the name of Tamerlan Tsarnaev was discovered to have posted videos associated with Salafist radicals, the Al Qaeda-linked “Black Banners of Khurusan,” and Feiz Muhammad, an Australian Islamic cleric who has condemned the Harry Potter books and films. There is no actual way to determine whether the Youtube account belonged to the older Tsarnaev brother or whether it was a feint established by parties intending to link him to Islamist radicals.

The entire marathon bombing event was punctuated by the wrong suspects being identified in the media before the authorities could positively conclude the identities of the suspects. Chief media offenders were Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and CNN. However, most of the media began resurrecting a slogan from the post-9/11 months: that the Boston marathon bombings represented the “new normal,” that is, that Americans should get used to the idea of living under virtual martial law with the U.S. Constitution representing nothing more than a “quaint piece of paper.”

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Who are the real Boston bombing "vultures" - big media & government, or truth-seekers?

Who's the real vulture - the mainstream terror profiteers, or the skeptics?
An open letter to Rob Kall, Editor, Op-Ed News

Dear Rob Kall,


You recently published an article calling people like me "despicable" for asking whether the Boston bombings might be a false-flag op. Such people, you say, are "vultures" and "tragedy parasites." You ask "cui-bono - who benefits from promulgating these junk theories?"  and answer with a bizarre hodge-podge of supposed beneficiaries:
-Anti-government people-- Libertarians, Republicans, anarchists
-People in the gun business
-People who want to create and maintain fear
-the one percent-- 
-People who want to keep the 99% from coming together  
-websites that feed the people who are susceptible to these theories
-people who want people to lose trust in any news source
The only two words in your article that make sense are: "cui bono"- who benefits? But that question should be applied to the bombing itself, and the mainstream coverage it was designed to create - not to those who question the official narrative.

The people asking questions about such events are, for the most part, not benefiting at all. On the contrary, they are losing benefits, and undergoing very real suffering, as a consequence of their dedication to the truth. For example, Professor James Tracy, who has asked excellent questions about Sandy Hook, has become the target of an orchestrated attempt at character assassination aimed at damaging or ending his career - the same thing that happened to me at the University of Wisconsin when I questioned 9/11.

Do you really believe that "people in the gun business" are writing and spreading articles suggesting that the Boston bombings or the Sandy Hook shootings might be false flag attacks? Do you honestly think that "the one percent" are spreading the false-flag meme? Do you really think the point of raising public consciousness about the ubiquity of false-flag incidents throughout history is to "keep the 99% from coming together"? How, precisely, would enlightening the public about the ongoing crime wave of false-flag incidents achieve any of these objectives? What, exactly, were you smoking when you strung together these non-sequiturs?

I think your article is a good example of what psychologists call a "reaction formation." I think you are afraid of finding out the truth about false-flag events. Specifically you are afraid of learning that your own US government is by far the world's biggest terrorist, that Israel and pro-Israeli forces in the US were behind 9/11, and that Israel is the global leader in false-flag attacks and strategies. (Your deep commitment to Zionism is evidenced by your attempt to discourage people from even using the word at Op-Ed News!)

I also sense a tinge of hysteria in your lashing out so wildly against people like me. Is it because you know we are winning the infowar, and you are losing? (Compare the readership of my Press TV article on the Boston bombings with that of your article.)

So in asking "cui bono" of the so-called "conspiracy theorists" (who don't benefit in any way except spiritually from their truth-seeking) you are projecting your own unconscious fear of finding out "who benefits" from terrorism. And the answer is that in almost all cases, the only beneficiaries of supposed anti-government terrorism are governments themselves. That is why almost all spectacular acts of terrorism are false-flag, state-sponsored operations.

As Vincent Vinciguerra, one of the perpetrators of the US-military-sponsored Operation Gladio terror attacks, explained: “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force . . . the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

And while governments benefit from "terrorism" by grabbing more money and power, big media benefits by making huge profits on its terror coverage. The Boston bombings earned many tens of millions of dollars for the mainstream media. By contrast, almost every independent media person pushing the false-flag meme is doing it for free - out of love of truth, not money.

Personally, I lost roughly two million dollars in anticipated lifetime earnings as a university professor because I refused to stop seeking the truth about 9/11 and other false-flag events. I doubt if the people pushing the mainstream line, including you, are sacrificing anything - except, perhaps, the most intelligent fraction of their audience.

But I could be wrong. I would like to hear you explain your position on this matter. (I'm sure you can do a better job than you did in your article.) So I am writing to invite you to join me on my radio show, 4 to 5 or 5 to 6 pm Eastern, on any Monday or Friday beginning May 26th for a friendly debate on who is creating which narratives about terrorism for whose benefit. And, of course, I would be happy to do the same thing on your radio show.

Thank you, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Kevin Barrett



Wednesday, April 17, 2013

‘False-flag’ meme goes mainstream on Boston Marathon bombings

After the Boston bombings of April 16th, 2013, even the corporate monopoly media could no longer ignore the possibility of a false-flag attack. 

Read the full article at PressTV:

‘False-flag’ meme goes mainstream on Boston Marathon bombings

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Al-CIA-duh aims to wreck Muslims, West in clash of civilizations


By Dr. Kevin Barrett, PressTV.ir
 
The al-Nusra front in Syria has officially announced that it is part of al-Qaeda. Even before the announcement, everyone knew it was al-Qaeda. So why is it being armed to the teeth with US-supplied weapons, and given training and strategic and diplomatic support by the US government?
The US, after all, is officially at war with al-Qaeda, which the American government blames for the still-unsolved crimes of September 11th, 2001...

Read the complete article at http://presstv.com/detail/2013/04/13/298068/why-is-us-backing-alqaeda-terrorists/

Saturday, April 13, 2013

The loopiest Zionist flack I have ever debated

I once thought Kenneth "you should be permanently removed from all media outlets everywhere in the world" Katzman was the nuttiest TV Zionist I would ever face.

And then I met Stewart Stogel.
Stewart Stogel is a walking, talking mishmash of non-sequiturs
When I heard that my opponent on Press TV's The Debate works for Newsmax, I realized that he probably wasn't the brightest filament in the pack of journalistic flashbulbs. Even so, his idiocy far exceeded my expectations.

I've debated a lot of goofy characters, but this guy takes the cake. Compared to him, Hannity and O'Reilly almost look sane.

To appreciate this guy, you need to watch the video, not just read the rough transcript.

WATCH THE PRESS TV VIDEO

* * *

US indifferent to Bahrain's want of democracy: Analyst

A Middle East expert says that Washington is indifferent to the Bahraini people’s aspirations for democracy and human rights since the US views Bahrain as nothing but the base for the US Fifth Fleet.
The comment comes as Bahrainis have staged a mass anti-regime demonstration near the capital to protest against the upcoming Formula One Grand Prix.

Thousands of Bahrainis took to the streets in the village of al-Aali, some 15 kilometers outside the capital Manama, on Friday to express their opposition to the Persian Gulf state's hosting of the April 19-21 event.

Bahrainis say Formula 1's governing body, the FIA, should cancel the event over Manama's ongoing crackdown on protests.

Press TV has conducted an interview with author and Middle East expert, Kevin Barrett, in Madison to further discuss the issue. The program also offers the opinions of New York-based Stewart Stogel with the Newsmax Magazine. What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Kevin Barrett, twenty arbitrary arrests of activists prior to the Formula One Grand Prix. So the race is more important than Bahrainis. It raises questions about the Bahraini authorities’ commitment to reform doesn’t it?

Barrett: Well, I think the question is about the Bahraini authorities commitment to reform “have already been answered” as the viewers will recall the Arab Spring died in Bahrain.

We had genuine people’s non-violent revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt and Bahrain was the next domino that was tottering and about to fall; this is when the Western imperial powers stepped in and shut down the Arab Spring in Bahrain.

They supported the Bahraini government which is kind of a puppet really of the US Empire and of Saudi Arabia which itself is a puppet of this empire as they crushed the non-violent peaceful demonstrations in Bahrain and then the imperial propaganda apparatus went into over drive in using all of the means of their disposal which are quite considerable everything from internet propaganda to probably even subliminal techniques I would imagine are being employed.

They were able to create these artificial destabilization uprisings in Libya and Syria and create vicious bloody civil wars in those countries designed to destabilize the last independent Arab nations.
So this has been an imperial mobilization really of the post-Arab Spring world and Bahrain is the place where they kill the Arab Spring and these rulers have been propped up, the Khalifa dynasty has been propped up by the empire and told this is the kind of country that we like to have in the Middle East.

A very small powerless country that’s really just a US naval air station with a couple of local figure heads running it; taking orders from the West; running all of its policy for the West and crushing any genuine popular sentiments for independence and for running the place on behalf of the local people and so this sets the stage for really what’s the coming conflict in the Middle East which is will this region be governed by its own people or will it be destroyed in destabilization efforts by the empire.

Press TV: Kevin Barrett (your reaction to the other guest)?

Barrett: If Obama isn’t an imperialist then [former Spanish dictator] Franco, Mussolini and Hitler aren’t fascists. Obama was put in power precisely as the velvet glove to follow the Iron fist of the [Dick] Cheney regime that used the false flag attacks of 9/11 to destabilize the Middle East.
Obama was set in there with his nice surface, his fancy talk, his middle name Hussein designed to appeal to people of this region as a way to continue the same imperial policies and in some ways accelerate the same destructive aggressive, illegal imperial policies that have been followed for decades and accelerated under the lawless era left by this 9/11 false flag attack. Obama is the biggest imperialist of the century and if anybody out there doesn’t know that they must be living in a cave somewhere.

Barrett: Obama raised the US military budget more than any other US president in decades, far more than any democratic president. Every other democratic president that’s come into office has actually reduced the increase of the military budget but Obama was the first democratic president since World War II who greatly increased the military budget in his first years in office.
He initiated a brutal drone campaign designed to assassinate political opposition all over the world. He has presided over the biggest expansion of US Empire since what, the Spanish American war.
And you are telling me this guy isn’t an imperialist. Excuse me but what arguments can you possibility muster to claim that Obama had shut down the US Empire; closed all 1000 US military bases there infesting our planet like little cancerous sores everywhere. What has he actually done to shut down the empire?

Press TV: Stewart Stogel do you want to respond to Kevin Barrett there?

Stogel: Who killed Daniel Pearl of the Wall Street Journal, freedom fighters? Who beheaded them, freedom fighters? These are the kinds of people you are defending?

Barrett: The short answer to that question is CIA killed Daniel Pearl. Daniel Pearl was killed by the same false flag terrorists running amuck in Pakistan.

Stogel: Who beheaded them? Who massacred them?

Barrett: It doesn’t matter who actually beheaded him. It matters who was paying the executioner who beheaded him and that executioner was obviously in the pay of the same people who are waging false flag destabilization campaigns in Pakistan and every other country on the region.
You should Google the name Raymond Davis. Raymond Davis is a CIA officer who was arrested planning false flag attacks in Pakistan. He was driving around Pakistan setting up bombings of mosques and markets. They were going to be attributed to so called ‘Islamic radicals.’ Google the name Raymond Davis CIA and you will find out the kind of people who killed Daniel Pearl.

Press TV: Viewer comment: “John Kerry, where is your call for regime change that you so eagerly and readily express for Syria? Why do you remain silent [on Bahrain]?”
Dino Di Lucido
Kevin Barrett reaction on that from you?

Barrett: Well, I actually heard a couple of things from the guest (Stewart Stogel) that weren’t complete nonsense so that’s nice. I think it’s true that the Bashar al-Assad government in Syria recognizes that its own destruction would bring in an era of even more repression and violence.
But I think the guest is utterly it appears to be ignorant of basic geopolitical realities which are that we have sort of a US Zionist imperialist axis that some of us consider the real axis of evil going up against those forces in the region and around the world that want to maintain independence.
And in Syria the Russians who are trying to maintain at least a degree of independence and a world in which we wouldn’t have a single imperial center, Washington DC or occupied Jerusalem or whatever are putting their foot down and saying no I’m sorry but NATO is not going to have the chance to overfly Syria and drop bombs and kill tens of thousands of people like they did in Libya. The Russians have said it’s going to have to be fought out on the ground in Syria.
So the imperial forces US, Israel and their puppet states like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are sending these-you know, they open their prisons, they say we’ll give you a lot of money criminals if you want to go in there and blow things up.
And so they are sending these mercenaries into Syria to wreak havoc and Syria is being destabilized by the empire; they’re punishing it for its support of the axis of resistance; its support of Hezbollah and Hammas and its refusal to knuckle under and be a slave of the empire that’s why they are destroying Syria.
It’s interesting that my fellow guest doesn’t even seem to recognize that there is a geopolitical aspect to any of this. He is just kind of delving these surface platitudes that get buzzed on Fox News as kind of brainwashing discourse to try to sucker Americans into remaining as ignorant of the world as they already are.

Barrett: (In response to the other guest) Nobody in the Middle East wants an American military anywhere in the Middle East. The entire Middle East wants US bases out.
They want US bases out. The population of the Middle East wants US bases out. Face that fact Sir. Would you like to be occupied? Would you like your country to be occupied by Chinese bases? Do you want to live under occupation yourself?
You should visit the Middle East yourself sometime. I speak Arabic pretty well and I’ve been there and I have yet to meet anybody from the Middle East who wants American occupation to continue and the people you hang out with over there being the puppets of the empire are probably quite happy but 99 percent of the population wants those US bases out and they want the Zionist occupation to end too.

Stogel: You know it’s funny if all these human rights abuses are going on especially in Bahrain I would have thought that at least the group of 77 would have raised the issue at the UN. I’ve seen very very little even with states ‘sympathetic’ to the anti-government Bahraini forces. I don’t see them making a big issue inside the UN before the human rights commission. Why don’t they do it? I haven’t seen any of what you are talking about.

Press TV: Kevin Barrett why don’t they do it enough?

Barrett: Well, they’re certainly not doing it enough but there are human rights organizations all over the world, including some of the big ones; they are taking a lot of money from the empire through the foundations which is supposed to keep them quiet on Bahrain and other sensitive issues but they are raising the issue of human rights in Bahrain if you haven’t heard about it I think you know again
you’ve been living in a cave.

Stogel: If the issues in Bahrain are that serious there are many sympathetic states in the Middle East why have they not raised on an official level to get legal action taken against the Bahraini authorities?

Barrett: I’m not sure what states you are referring to that are sympathetic to the people of Bahrain obviously Iran would be sympathetic because it’s still an independent state.
Stogel: Why is Iran not raising the issue on a formal level at the UN?

Barrett: I hope they do and maybe since Press TV has a pretty big English speaking audience in Iran they’ll pick it up.

Press TV: Kevin Barrett we are looking at two years on here and we had the US human rights and labor assistant secretary of state for Bureau of democracy, Michael Posner. Well, they said they welcome the call for dialogue by the Bahraini government. That was last year and here we are; is this just talk from the US so they can add their comments on it but yet do nothing about it?

Barrett: Of course it is. The US has decided that the base for the US fifth fleet which is what Bahrain is; is more important than the aspirations for democracy and human rights of the people of Bahrain. That’s not new the US Empire has been making this kind of decision about virtually any country it occupies in the world and there have been many dozens, probably hundreds since World War II.
William Bloom’s great book Killing Hope gives a pretty good record of these US occupations, CIA interventions and military interventions that have killed probably more than ten million people and ruined the lives of many dozens of millions since World War II. Bahrain is just more road kill on the highway or road kill on the Formula one road race of the empire.

Friday, April 12, 2013

Israel, US arm al-Qaeda to break Syria into pieces: Dr. Kevin Barrett



Watch the Press TV video 

An analyst says the United States and its Zionist masters are using al-Qaeda and other militant groups as a tool to break up Syria into pieces.

In the background of this the al-Nusra rebel Group in Syria, financed and supported with equipment and training by certain Western and Arab countries, has confessed to being a part of al-Qaeda. Syria is now urging the United Nations to classify the al-Nusra Front as an al-Qaeda-linked group. Syria has always maintained that the bulk of fighting and atrocities in Syria are being conducted by these extremist foreign entities funded by a coalition of enemy countries and that there is no civil war as Western media are leading their populations to believe.

Press TV has interviewed Dr. Kevin Barrett, author and political commentator, Madison about this issue. The following is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Should we expect the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) to respond positively to this Syrian request?

Barrett: I doubt it. Unfortunately, the United Nations and the leading powers that dominates the United Nations - of course, the US and its NATO allies - are very hypocritical in the way they deal with so-called al-Qaeda.

On the one hand they pretend that al-Qaeda is some sort of jihadist group that wants to destroy the United States, which is why it is OK to run all over the world murdering people with drone attacks. That’s all supposedly part of this emergency of global war against al-Qaeda.

And yet in Syria, which is the main place where we have people who are declaring themselves to be al-Qaeda actually fighting and conducting terrorist attacks, it seems that the big global institutions like the US, NATO and the UN are perfectly happy to not only allow this so-called al-Qaeda radical Islamic group to be wreaking havoc in Syria and destabilizing the Syrian government, but they are actually arming them.

So it will be really interesting to see how the West deals with this situation now that the al-Nusra Front is actually declaring itself to be a part of al-Qaeda.
Press TV: From day one the United States has said it only wants to support moderate groups such as the FSA (Free Syrian Army) according to it, which is moderate. How do you respond to such an argument?

Barrett: The fact of the matter is that the people who were doing most of the fighting in Syria are these people who are calling themselves linked to al-Qaeda.

And the weapons that are going to this so-called insurgent coalition are ending up mainly in the hands of these people.

And of course they’re not really fighting for a kind of a big anti-imperialist Islamic revolution, although a few of them actually believe that. This is all part of a destabilization operation aimed at Syria and the Middle East designed to break Syria up into pieces according to the ‘Yinon Plan’ (Zionist plan for the Middle East) that was drafted in Israel several decades ago.

So this idea that there are good moderate groups blowing up schools and mosques and so on in Syria and then there are also some bad groups, and that somehow the US is going to make sure that the weapons are only going to the nice moderate groups, is really a charade.
The hypocrisy of these Western powers is just getting way out of control.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Why I am not a secularist

Tuesday's radio guest, Feroze Mithiborwala, thinks that secularism is the solution to the problems of religious extremism and religious conflict in South Asia, and around the world. I disagree. I think religious extremism and religious conflict are being created/exacerbated by the New World Order as part of its war on traditional religion. It's the same old "problem-reaction-solution" method they always use. Religious extremism and violence is the problem; the public reacts against it; then they offer a secularist New World Order dictatorship, run by closet Satanists, as the solution.

Below is my response to a pro-secularism message from Feroze.

-KB



Hi Feroze,

I don't have much faith in secularism, which amounts to the removal of religion/spirituality from public life. That's what the New World Order means - the first world order without religion as the glue that holds society together. The NWO movement is funded by the Rothschilds, and its avant-garde consists of Illuminati satanists who make a fetish of human sacrifice…which is what monotheistic religion came to eliminate.

See: http://eddieleaks.org/2011/04/30/were-the-twin-towers-sacrificed/   and http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-most-dangerous-radio-show-in-world.html

On monotheism as the end of human sacrifice, read the works of the great Christian philospher René Girard, who misunderstands Islam but is otherwise on-target.

 The only alternative to religion/spirituality as the prime force for social cohesion is coercion. And the secular societies are developing more and more horrific means of coercion. Secularism, in the long term, means Orwellian dystopia. We're already most of the way there.

So the alternative to bad religion is good religion, not secularism. And bad religion is actually counterfeit religion - it's a hollow shell that's in reality a form of secularism. Saudi Arabia is just another version of Houston, Texas.

I think Islam is the best alternative (as Murad Hoffman put it) for the over-arching framework of governance of large-scale societies. Islam can take the model of Andalusia one step further, and protect and encourage other religions (somewhat selectively, of course - nobody wants to protect Michael Aquino's Satanism) while establishing the basic principle that spiritual development is the prime good around which society is organized.  A society in which all workaday activity stops for the five daily prayers, nobody eats in public during Ramadan, no blasphemy against any religion is allowed, sexuality and sexual expression are reserved for the private sphere, all children receive some form of religious education, alcohol is far more rigorously discouraged than marijuana, mushrooms, etc. etc. would be vastly better than today's secular "artificial paradises" that are so beautiful on the outside but so stultifying to the inner life, and so destructive to the biosphere. (Secular Europe is dying out because secular people are too selfish to want to care for children, while the secular USA is a plague on the planet.)

Islam is set up to create a framework for a religiously-based multi-religious society; no other religion is. Perhaps God intended it that way - that would explain why Islam is said to be the final revelation and Muhammad (pbuh) the seal of the prophets. 

Originally, the Enlightenment was very pro-religion but anti-coercion. Here in the US, religious organizations are still subsidized through tax exemptions for this reason.  And the hardcore atheists/secularists hate it. They're destroying religious values through coercive propaganda and dumbing down the population. (Perception of spiritual values is the highest form of intelligence.)

The destruction of religious values in the wake of the Enlightenment and European world conquest is robbing humanity of its soul. The Islamic awakening is posing the most significant challenge to the New World Order globalist-secularist project, which is why all of the NWO's coercive technologies, including the 9/11-launched war on Islam and the creation of synthetic "Islamic fanatics," are being applied to destroy it.

Kevin

Friday, April 5, 2013

Zombie morons swarm internet, erupt into real world

An army of zombie morons that has been slowly gathering strength on the internet is about to erupt into the real world and wreak havoc, according to national security sources.

One anonymous Department of Homeland official claims that the situation is even worse than that: "According to unconfirmed reports, throngs of zombie morons may have already broken through thousands if not millions of computer screens, trailing blood and broken glass in their wake as they eat the brains of any halfway-intelligent real-world human they can find." Once a victim's brain has been eaten, the victim becomes a zombie moron himself and shambles around looking for people with yummy, yummy brains.

Rocky Mountain High School in Colorado was recently the scene of an apparent zombie moron attack. Legions of frothing-at-the-mouth zombie moron parents attacked teachers and administrators for teaching students how to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in various languages, including Arabic - whose word for God, used by Arabic-speaking Christians, Jews, and Muslims, is "Allah."  Since the phrase "one nation under God" in Arabic is "umma wahida tata Allah" the zombie moron parents, imagining that their children were swearing fealty to the Muslim Brotherhood, began frothing at the mouth and swarming the school, in hopes of devouring the brains of any intelligent life forms they found.

Another recent zombie moron attack occurred at the Daily Beast - a hardcore-Zionist-owned site plagued by frequent outbreaks. The Daily Un-American Beast (DUMB), as people whose brains have not yet been devoured call it, published a Guide to Americans' Craziest Conspiracy Theories - a palpably obvious psy-op designed by zombie morons to influence even dumber zombie morons. By strewing the cyber-landscape with idiotic "conspiracy theories" like "Paul McCartney died in 1966," "lizard people control society," "Obama is the anti-Christ," and "Bin Laden is still alive," mixed in with slightly-less-idiotic ones like "the moon landings were faked," the zombie morons at the Beast are trying to incite the even stupider zombie morons who frequent the site into attacking anyone with enough brains to recognize that 9/11 was an inside job, the Kennedy brothers were killed by insiders, the Federal Reserve banksters and their military-industrial-intelligence complex dominate the Deep State, Zionists dominate the media and own Hollywood outright, and so on.

The Beast's psy-op, so absurdly transparent that only zombie morons could possibly be behind it (and only even dumber ones could fall for it), uses classic, easily-recognizable psychological warfare techniques in a hilariously ham-fisted manner. Two of those techniques, inversion and skunking, are exemplified by the Beast's "Bin Laden is still alive" meme. The truth - that Bin Laden almost certainly died in December 2001, as reported by Pakistani and Egyptian media, and that all subsequent "Bin Laden" events have been hoaxes - is inverted by the Beast, and then "skunked" in the popular mind by identifying it with its ridiculous inversion. (Note that the Beast's whole article is one big attempt to "skunk" the so-called conspiracy theories that are true and gaining credibility among the public.)

The Beast also uses another classic psy-op technique, cognitive dissonance, to terminate any residual thought processes that may be plaguing its acephalic readership. Example: The Beast offers as a supposedly ridiculous conspiracy theory the statement that "29 percent of voters believe aliens exist."

But wait a minute - OF COURSE aliens exist!  The absolute minimum number of planets in the visible universe is 6 sextillion or 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 - and the real number (even leaving aside invisible universes and other dimensions) is almost certainly vastly, unimaginably higher. If our world and our solar system are even slightly ordinary - and only a megalomaniacal nut would presume that his world and his solar system are extraordinary - then the universe is teeming with intelligent life, much of it with space-travel and (presumably) time-travel and inter-dimensional-travel technology as far ahead of what we now have as the Space Shuttle is ahead of the scamperings of an ant. If our species, and our world, are not already the property of vastly-more-advanced aliens, we are beating zillions-to-one odds. And whether or not earth is owned or being visited by aliens, as a fair amount of evidence suggests, only a zombie moron without a single viable synapse left could doubt that "aliens exist" somewhere among the untold sextillions of planets.

So the Beast's cognitive dissonance operation works like this: Take a statement that is obviously (intellectually) true - aliens exist - and skunk it so it appears (emotionally) as laughably false. The conflict between the two ways of perceiving the same statement paralyzes the mind of the target - assuming the target has any mind left to paralyze (which, considering the Beast's audience, is a big assumption).

By training its zombie moron audience in the habit of cognitive dissonance, the Beast is hoping that the habit will persist when the audience encounters other "conspiracy theories."  For example, when a zombie moron trained by the Beast (intellectually) sees the Twin Towers exploding, but (emotionally) imagines that they are just falling down in gravity-driven collapses caused by evil Muslim suicide hijackers, the zombie moron will instinctively ridicule the obviously-true "conspiracy theory"...and the conflict between intellect and emotion, between truth and falsehood, will paralyze the last few synapses he may possess. He starts drooling and lurching, and is now ready to go out and "eat brains."

COMING UP NEXT: ZOMBIE MORONS EMERGE FROM COMMENTS SECTIONS, BLAST COMPUTER USERS WITH FLAME-THROWERS AND DEVOUR "BARBECUED BRAINS" IN A NEW TWIST ON "FLAME WARS"...








Thursday, April 4, 2013

Five good reasons not to nuke Washington, DC

Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Kim Jong-un's Nuclear Threats

By Kevin Barrett, TruthJihad.com

When I heard that North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un was threatening to nuke Washington, DC, and "engulf the nation's capital in a sea of flames," my first thought was: "At last, a politician with a plan that could actually solve our nation's most pressing problems."



The thought of Inside-the-Beltway Washington going up in flames brought joy to my heart. The politicians - incinerated! The lobbyists - carbonized! The Supreme Court - cremated! The Pentagon - a five-sided crème brûlée! AIPAC - reduced to cinders that would fit in a Volkswagen's ashtray!

No more nightmares about an aerial army of drones swooping down on us like the wicked witch's winged monkeys. No more concerns that my friends, neighbors, or family might end up on the "kill list" of Obama's death panels. No more visions of Washington's political monkeys rounding us up and sending us to Haliburton detention camps. No more uneasiness about DHS's order for billions of hollow-point bullets. No more false flag attacks, and no more pompous political posers lying us into idiotic wars.

After all, they've burned the Constitution. So there is no longer any reason not to burn Washington, DC.

At this point, it's either them or us.

If Washington were gone, erased from the face of the earth, the planet would be infinitely better for it. There would be nobody left to trash our economy and steal our money and use it to bully folks on the far side of the world who would rather be minding their own damn business...folks like Kim Jong-un, who apparently is fed up, and rightfully so, with Washington thinking it's in charge of every distant corner of the earth.

To hell with Washington, DC. The sooner they nuke it, the better, as far as I'm concerned.

But I'm a thoughtful, reasonable guy. I try to look at both sides of every issue. So I thought to myself, "Wait a minute...suppose there's something I'm missing." I sat down with a pencil and paper and decided to make a list of all the reasons NOT to nuke Washington, DC.

Fourteen hours later, I had come up with five good reasons.

So I decided to write an open letter to Kim Jong-un, just in case he hadn't yet considered all the pros and cons.

The Honorable Kim Jong-un
Supreme Leader, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Pyongyang, North Korea

Dear Supreme Leader Jong-un (may I call you Kim?)

Dennis Rodman says you're a stand-up guy, which makes you all right in my book. So I thought I'd check in with you about your promise to nuke Washington, DC and turn it into a "sea of flames."

I understand that threatening to nuke Washington, DC is a good political move in North Korea. Have you considered that it might also be a good political move here in America?

Since you're obviously an ambitious guy - not every leader of an economic-basket-case country of 25 million people runs around threatening to nuke DC - I think you ought to consider ditching your current job and running for President of the USA on a "Nuke Washington" platform.

The polls show that the American people HATE Washington, DC. Congress's "favorable" rating has been running at the edge of the single digits for years. The rest of DC isn't doing much better.

If you came here and promised to nuke Washington, you wouldn't just be elected in a landslide. You'd be anointed Supreme Leader here too, by popular acclaim.

There are, however, compelling reasons not to nuke Washington, DC. After spending all day and most of the night trying to think of some, I came up with the following list:

1) There are quite a few dogs, cats, rats, cockroaches, trees, shrubs, and other innocent animals and plants that live there.

2) If Washington were scrubbed from the face of the earth, Americans would no longer have a focus for their hatred, and the nation would become disunited and fractious.

3) Ditto for the world.

4) If you give the orders to "nuke Washington," your missile might accidentally be delivered to Washington state, which has really beautiful mountains and rivers and stuff.

5) If Washington DC gets nuked, and all its freemasonic symbols are obliterated, the damn freemasons will just move their world capital to Jerusalem, bulldoze the al-Aqsa mosque, put up a temple for sacrificing red heifers, and rebuild DuPont Circle, the Washington's Dick Monument, Congress, the White House, AIPAC, the whole nine yards...so the whole thing will turn out to have been pointless.

Then again, what difference does it make if they move America's capital to Israel - the whole place has been owned by the Israelis for years anyway.

So, on balance, I would urge you to refrain from nuking Washington DC until you have considered all your options - including a possible run for Supreme Leader of the USA.

Sincerely, Dr. Kevin Barrett
-deep in the woods of western Wisconsin, just about as far away from Washington, DC as I can get without falling into the Mississippi River