Tuesday's radio guest, Feroze Mithiborwala, thinks that secularism is the solution to the problems of religious extremism and religious conflict in South Asia, and around the world. I disagree. I think religious extremism and religious conflict are being created/exacerbated by the New World Order as part of its war on traditional religion. It's the same old "problem-reaction-solution" method they always use. Religious extremism and violence is the problem; the public reacts against it; then they offer a secularist New World Order dictatorship, run by closet Satanists, as the solution.
Below is my response to a pro-secularism message from Feroze.
I don't have much faith in secularism, which amounts to the removal of religion/spirituality from public life. That's what the New World Order means - the first world order without religion as the glue that holds society together. The NWO movement is funded by the Rothschilds, and its avant-garde consists of Illuminati satanists who make a fetish of human sacrifice…which is what monotheistic religion came to eliminate.
See: http://eddieleaks.org/2011/04/30/were-the-twin-towers-sacrificed/ and http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-most-dangerous-radio-show-in-world.html
On monotheism as the end of human sacrifice, read the works of the great Christian philospher René Girard, who misunderstands Islam but is otherwise on-target.
The only alternative to religion/spirituality as the prime force for social cohesion is coercion. And the secular societies are developing more and more horrific means of coercion. Secularism, in the long term, means Orwellian dystopia. We're already most of the way there.
So the alternative to bad religion is good religion, not secularism. And bad religion is actually counterfeit religion - it's a hollow shell that's in reality a form of secularism. Saudi Arabia is just another version of Houston, Texas.
I think Islam is the best alternative (as Murad Hoffman put it) for the over-arching framework of governance of large-scale societies. Islam can take the model of Andalusia one step further, and protect and encourage other religions (somewhat selectively, of course - nobody wants to protect Michael Aquino's Satanism) while establishing the basic principle that spiritual development is the prime good around which society is organized. A society in which all workaday activity stops for the five daily prayers, nobody eats in public during Ramadan, no blasphemy against any religion is allowed, sexuality and sexual expression are reserved for the private sphere, all children receive some form of religious education, alcohol is far more rigorously discouraged than marijuana, mushrooms, etc. etc. would be vastly better than today's secular "artificial paradises" that are so beautiful on the outside but so stultifying to the inner life, and so destructive to the biosphere. (Secular Europe is dying out because secular people are too selfish to want to care for children, while the secular USA is a plague on the planet.)
Islam is set up to create a framework for a religiously-based multi-religious society; no other religion is. Perhaps God intended it that way - that would explain why Islam is said to be the final revelation and Muhammad (pbuh) the seal of the prophets.
Originally, the Enlightenment was very pro-religion but anti-coercion. Here in the US, religious organizations are still subsidized through tax exemptions for this reason. And the hardcore atheists/secularists hate it. They're destroying religious values through coercive propaganda and dumbing down the population. (Perception of spiritual values is the highest form of intelligence.)
The destruction of religious values in the wake of the Enlightenment and European world conquest is robbing humanity of its soul. The Islamic awakening is posing the most significant challenge to the New World Order globalist-secularist project, which is why all of the NWO's coercive technologies, including the 9/11-launched war on Islam and the creation of synthetic "Islamic fanatics," are being applied to destroy it.