If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Barrett: Wisconsin Revolution has only just begun!

Normally, I would never use this forum to reprint verbatim a press release from a politician. But in this case I’ll make an exception. -KB

Barrett: Wisconsin Revolution 
has only just begun!   

BarrettforCongress.blogspot.com

“To hell with the Republicans. And to purgatory with the Democrats! Whatever happens next Tuesday, the Wisconsin Revolution has only just begun!”

Dr. Kevin Barrett, 50th cousin of gubernatorial candidate Tom Barrett*, will be announcing his candidacy for US House of Representatives (2nd District) this Thursday, May 31st, at 6:30 p.m. outside the Barrymore Theatre, 2090 Atwood Avenue, Madison, WI.

Dr. Barrett will run as an independent. “I am running AGAINST the two major parties, and the corrupt system they dominate,” he explained. “Thanks to them, the USA is no longer a free country, and its middle class is being decimated. We need a revolution. I want to take the Wisconsin Revolution nationwide.”

Barrett explained: “The Wisconsin revolution isn’t just about teachers’ unions. It’s a revolution against the controlled demolition of the middle class, and the transformation of the USA into a fascist banana republic.”



What kind of revolution do we need?

“Most of the elite of this country – the big CEOs, the banksters, Trilateralists, Bilderbergers, top-tier FBI, CIA and military, top executive branch officials, election-riggers, media owners, the federal judges and the majority of congress-critters – need to be jailed. We need an American version of Tahrir Square in Washington, DC. And we need to put our entire elite in jail with Mubarak and Ben Ali.”

Barrett’s campaign platform includes:

* End the wars and jail the war criminals.
* Bring all troops home, close all foreign bases, slash military spending 90%.
* Repeal all post-9/11 police state legislation, jail those responsible for unconstitutional laws.
* Seize the “bailed-out” banks and jail the banksters.
* End the Fed, restore Constitutional currency.
* End “free trade” (NAFTA etc.) and rebuild our industry, infrastructure, and middle class.
* End the “drug war,” free all consensual-crimes prisoners
* Reveal the truth about 9/11 – the shock that will make revolution possible.


* Geneticists say all humans are at least 50th cousins.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Memorial Day Remembrance: Remember 9/11!


On Memorial Day, we are supposed to remember the troops who died serving our country.

So let’s remember them. And let’s also remember the ones who didn’t die, just got maimed and brutalized and traumatized: The guys and gals poisoned with DU and experimental vaccines, who were given evil orders, whose bodies and/or souls were injured “in the line of duty.”

And let’s not forget their victims – the brave people fighting on the other side…and the “innocent” ones who weren’t fighting, just existing in the wrong place at the wrong time. The people our troops killed are open wounds, bleeding holes in our flag, and there are millions.

But of all of war’s many victims, maybe the ones we should remember most are the victims of 9/11. Those thousands of souls snuffed out on 9/11 are still screaming at us from the other world, screaming out for truth and justice.

The jumpers who leaped out of the windows of the Towers are still tumbling through the air, still squashing like pumpkins on the pavement, and as they endlessly fall, and endlessly splat, they are screaming at us: WE WANT JUSTICE! OUR SOULS CANNOT HAVE PEACE UNTIL YOU, THE LIVING, GIVE US TRUTH AND JUSTICE!

The accountants and ONI people killed in the Pentagon bombing are yelling at us from the other world: “DON’T LET THE BASTARDS GET AWAY WITH IT! THERE WILL BE NO PEACE FOR US, NOR FOR YOU, UNTIL THE TRUTH IS REVEALED AND JUSTICE IS SERVED!”

The people in the Towers blown to smithereens by the devices that annihilated those buildings, melted and vaporized their steel, and turned their concrete to pyroclastic billows of talcum power, are still endlessly being blown to bits and screaming, as their bodies are about to be pulverized, “ARE YOU PEOPLE BLIND? CAN’T YOU SEE WHAT WAS DONE TO US?”

Murdered whistleblowers like Barry Jennings are screaming “We told the truth and were murdered for it. Isn’t anybody listening?”

Murdered 9/11 truth-seeker Senator Paul Wellstone, his wife and child, and four others taken out in a brutal message to the Congress are still screaming, as their plane is going down: “They did this to us, they did this to you, they did this to our country! We are all eternally going down in this crash until you expose the truth and justice prevails!”

And still the Towers endlessly explode. And still the Pentagon is eternally being bombed. And Jennings’ death is still attributed to no known cause. And still the Wellstones’ plane is, always and forever, going down in a powerful beam of EMF radiation directed from the white van in the woods.

These casualties of war must be remembered.

And remembered.

Until the pain of memory burns so searingly that we are unable not to act.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Middle East Terrorism Quiz

Hello, students! Welcome to Middle East Studies 101.  I'm Dr. Barrett, the Middle East Studies expert. You may have seen me on Press TV or Russia Today... or maybe even on one of those lame minor-league propaganda outlets like Fox, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, or CBS.

As you know, I've been witch-hunted out of the University of Wisconsin by State Rep. Steve Nass. He doesn't want me to tell you what the vast majority of Middle Eastern people think really happened on 9/11, or why they think it.

The bad news is that I no longer get a paycheck for helping educate you.

The good news is that I can just flat-out tell you the truth about what is really going on, instead of watering it down by being "fair and balanced" toward viewpoints that are obviously full of shit.

Today we're going to have a quiz on Middle East Terrorism. Please take out your number two pencils and answer the following questions:

1) What Middle Eastern terrorist organization sent mail bombs to President Harry Truman in a failed attempt to kill him?

2) What Middle East terrorist organization has such powerful US assets that it succeeded in covering up the Truman assassination attempt?

3) What Middle East terrorist group bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on July 22nd, 1946, killing 91 people and injuring 46?

4) What Middle East terrorist group committed the Deir Yassin massacre on April 9th, 1948, killing more than 100 defenseless civilians (mostly women and children)?

5) What Middle East terrorist group bombed American targets in Egypt in the Lavon Affair of 1954?

6) What Middle East terrorist group is suspected of involvement in the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy?

7) What Middle East terrorist group attacked the unarmed American spy ship USS Liberty in June 8th, 1967, killing 34 crew members and injuring 170, in a failed attempt to sink the ship and murder the entire crew?

8) What Middle East terrorist group started the 1967 Mideast war?

9) What Middle East terrorist group orchestrated the 1976 Entebbe hijacking incident, in which 55 people were killed, including Benjamin Netanyahu's brother?

10) What Middle East terrorist group orchestrated the Achille Lauro hijacking, in which wheelchair-bound American citizen Leon Klinghoffer was pushed overboard, triggering outrage around the world?

11) What Middle East terrorist group killed 241 US Marines in Beirut, Lebanon in October, 1983?

12) What Middle East terrorist group is said by a former high-ranking member to be continually “actively spying,  recruiting,  organizing and carrying out covert activities mainly in New York and Washington,  which they refer to as their playground” ?

13) The leader of which Middle East terrorist group celebrated the success of the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, and bragged that his organization was behind them?

14) Members of which Middle East terrorist group were arrested for filming (with foreknowledge) and wildly celebrating the success of the destruction of the World Trade Center?

15) The leader of which Middle East terrorist group was warned to cancel his planned trip to downtown London on the day of the 7/7/2005 London bombings?

16) Which Middle East terrorist group is alleged by intelligence insiders to have repeatedly used latest-generation "mini-nuke" hydrogen bombs against Western civilians?

17) Which Middle East terrorist group has targeted all the capitals of Europe and the Middle East with nuclear weapons?

18) Which Middle East terrorist group is believed by most Europeans to be the biggest threat to world peace?

19) Which Middle East terrorist group insists that torturing captives is perfectly legitimate?

20) Which Middle East terrorist group has captured, held, tortured, and killed the most hostages?

21) Which Middle East terrorist group includes religious fanatics bent on taking over the world and enslaving everyone who does not belong to their ethnicity and religion?

22) Which Middle East terrorist group has the biggest presence in the underworlds of the drug trade, human trafficking, illegal human organ sales, the illegal arms trade, and organized crime in general?

23) Which Middle Eastern terrorist group worked extensively on "race-specific bioweapons" with the apartheid regime in South Africa?

24) Which Middle Eastern terrorist group has penetrated and "turned" the global media?

25) Which Middle Eastern terrorist group is best-funded, and where do those funds come from?

Bonus Question: Which Middle Eastern terrorist group is so vicious and dangerous that almost nobody working at any American university dares to openly call it a terrorist group?


ANSWERS

The correct answer to every question is "The Zionist Entity."  If you called it "Israel," you are being extremely offensive (legitimizing a terrorist group by pretending it's a legitimate country is terribly hurtful to its victims) but I will still give you full credit, as long as you promise to make an appointment with the Office of Diversity, Sensitivity, and Political Correctness.

Note: Our next quiz will be on global terrorism - preview here.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Evil, Madness, and Blind Spots: Two New Books on Psychopathy Leave their Selective Empathy Showing

A review of Jon Ronson’s The Psychopath Test: A Journey through the Madness Industry and Simon Baron-Cohen’s The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty

by Kevin Barrett, http://truthjihad.com

Both The Psychopath Test and The Science of Evil are constructed around psychological “empathy tests.” Both ask whether evil can be scientifically pinned down. Both were published in 2011 by British Jews. Both are extremely valuable books. And both suffer from the same, predictable blind spot.

There has been a lot of talk about psychopaths lately.

The category “psychopath” or “sociopath” (the terms are interchangeable), invented more than half a century ago by Hervey Cleckley, has been a stealthy presence in popular culture ever since. From vintage Hitchcock to The Silence of the Lambs, Hollywood has evinced a fascination with psychopathic character traits and the macabre crimes with which they are sometimes associated.

Psychopathy, for those who’ve missed all the talk, is a kind of congenital and incurable amorality that afflicts one or two percent of the population. It seems to be at least partly biologically based, the product of certain types of brain dysfunction.

In recent years, Martha Stout and Robert Hare have upped the ante by publishing nonfiction bestsellers about psychopathy. Stout’s The Psychopath Next Door is a self-help manual for self-defense against psychopathic neighbors, co-workers, or even family members; while Hare’s books, including Snakes in Suits, explore the extensive damage psychopaths inflict on society and reflect on what can be done about it.

Talk of psychopathy has been growing even faster and louder in the subculture of political skeptics pejoratively labeled “conspiracy theorists” by big media propagandists. Many of the roughly 200 million Americans who think the JFK assassination was an inside job, like the roughly 100 million who think the same thing about 9/11, have begun to whisper about the possibility that people with psychopathic character traits (like Lyndon Johnson and Dick Cheney) have a huge advantage in the competition to rise to the top of power hierarchies. This hypothesis might explain why power elite members regularly commit crimes so horrible and outlandish that most ordinary people find them incomprehensible, hence impossible and to be ruled out a priori. The corollary: Anyone who sees and speaks the truth must be a delusional “conspiracy theorist.”

Read “Twilight of the Psychopaths” – the most popular thing I ever wrote

The political skeptics’ interest in psychopathy got a big boost from Andrzej Lobaczewski’s Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes. Lobaczewski, a Polish psychiatrist, discovered that the Communist party elite in his country was top-heavy with psychopaths, whose cognitive style and behavior had managed to contaminate the whole society. Published by Red Pill Press at the turn of the millennium, Political Ponerology became an underground classic post-9/11. Many in the 9/11 truth movement asserted that the US was suffering from psychopathic contagion under Bush and Cheney, just as Poland had under its Communist dictatorship (and as Germany and Russia had under Hitler and Stalin).

Now, as the second decade of the 20th century begins, two British-Jewish authors have contributed valuable mass-market works on psychopathy. Both books are built around very similar personality tests: the Hare test for psychopathy, and the Baron-Cohen test for empathy (psychopaths are zero-empathy people). Interestingly, both books, despite their wildly different approaches to the topic, suffer from virtually identical blind spots.

Jon Ronson’s The Psychopath Test, like all of Ronson’s books, is a hilarious work of journalistic genius. (Full disclosure: Although Ronson repeatedly consulted me while writing the book, and at one point planned to have me administer psychopathy tests to wealthy and powerful individuals under his sponsorship, I have no financial stake in this or any other Ronson book, nor have I ever received a penny from Ronson, much less been flown to Europe to administer psychopathy tests to royalty and aristocracy as he originally proposed.)

The Psychopath Test is a brilliant riff on one of my favorite comic themes: In this crazy world, who’s really crazy? Might the the inmates be running the asylum?

Ronson has mined this sort of comic territory before. In Them: Adventures with Extremists he snuck into Bohemian Grove with the “paranoid extremist conspiracy theorist” Alex Jones; and while predictably poking fun at Jones and other political skeptics, the real punchline of the book comes when Ronson is shocked to discover that the annual secret meeting of the world’s movers and shakers known as “Bilderberg” – almost entirely blacked out from the mainstream media – is indeed real, rather than the figment of paranoid conspiratorial imagination he had assumed.

Ronson’s second book, The Men Who Stare at Goats, follows the same trajectory. It begins by making fun of seemingly crazy military guys who think they can kill people psychically just by staring at them – and practice on goats. Which seems fairly amusing and harmless, unless you’re a goat. Or perhaps even if you are a goat. But by the end of the book, we learn that the US military and intelligence community’s interest in bizarre psychic and psychological experiments has a much darker side. We learn, for example, that many experimental subjects have been tortured to death by the CIA during Mengele-style mind control experiments, and that one of the experimenters who wanted to blow the whistle – Frank Olson – was pushed out of the window of a high-rise to protect the perpetrators of these atrocities. (The full story is told in Hank Albarelli’s A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments.)

Listen to my interview with Albarelli here.

Similar experiments, Ronson suggests, may be going on in today’s archipelago of secret prisons associated with the “war on terror.”

Ronson’s first two books play around with their respective domains of fringe research in ambivalent fashion: Ronson leads the perceptive reader toward concluding that while political skeptics are amusing and somewhat mad, some of them may have a point.

Unfortunately, Ronson’s otherwise excellent The Psychopath Test is not just mildly unfair, but wildly unfair to political skeptics, whom he pejoratively labels “conspiracy theorists.” He packs almost all of that unfairness into just one chapter – the one focusing on David Shayler, the former MI-5 agent who exposed some of MI-6′s murderous intrigues with al-Qaeda, became a major figure in the 9/11 and 7/7 truth movements, then suddenly went mad and declared himself the messiah.

Ronson’s hallucinatory description of the 7/7 truth movement makes one wonder whether he himself got a dose of whatever was given to Shayler: “These people evidently believed an accidental power surge had coursed through the London Underground that morning and that the British government wanted to cover up this corporate manslaughter by blaming it on Islamic suicide bombers” (182-183). This is a bit like saying “the people who believe the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was faked claim it was staged by aliens from outer space.” I have done a fair amount of research on the 7/7 truth movement (and the Gulf of Tonkin Incident) and I have never heard anyone blame accidental power surges or space aliens. The fact is, Ronson’s claim is a lie. The 7/7 truth movement has always blamed a false-flag operation, not an accidental power surge, for the London bombings.

Ronson then suggests that only a tiny minority of the 9/11 truth movement agrees with the 7/7 truth movement: “Now everybody knew somebody who was convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. They were armchair Agatha Christie sleuths, meeting on forums, sending each other YouTube links, telling each other they were right. Only the most extreme magical-thinkers among them were 7/7 conspiracy theorists, too: while 9/11 obviously wasn’t an inside job, 7/7 OBVIOUSLY wasn’t an inside job” (183).

Again, this just isn’t true. I happened to be in Washington DC in July, 2005 shortly after the London bombings, mingling with the crème-de-la-crème of the 9/11 truth movement – respected academician David Ray Griffin, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, historian Webster Tarpley, 9/11 timeline creator Paul Thompson, author-researcher Nafeez Ahmed, the folks from 911truth.org, dozens of other big names, and a few hundred concerned citizens. Everyone I spoke to there was shocked at how pathetically obvious the 7/7 false-flag job had been, how it had been botched almost as badly as 9/11. The “bombers” had to have taken trains that weren’t even running; the “backpack bombs” exploded UNDER the trains; the many security camera images of the bombers what would have existed had the bombers actually been bombers were never produced, while only one blatantly photoshopped “security camera” image ever emerged; Ariel Sharon was warned to stay out of downtown London right before the blasts; and in perhaps the most outrageous screw-up in false-flag history, the UK’s top terror consultant Peter Power appeared on television that afternoon and, visibly shaken, announced that he still couldn’t believe how each of the four bombs had exploded at exactly the time and location as the imaginary bombs in a “terror drill” he was involved in that day!

It wasn’t just the 9/11 truth supporters at that conference who were quickly forced to face the obvious fact that 7/7 was yet another false-flag attack. In my eight years in the 9/11 truth movement, I have never met a single 9/11 truth supporter who didn’t think 7/7 was an inside job. My radio show draws a good-size audience of truth-seekers from around the world; I am regularly on Press TV with its potential audience of over 100 million; my blog posts get lots of comments, and I have repeatedly covered 7/7 as well as 9/11 – in fact, I even wrote the preface to the best book on 7/7, Nick Kollerstrom’s Terror on the Tube. Surely if someone in the 9/11 truth movement thought 7/7 was actually done by Islamic suicide bombers, they would have left a comment to that effect on one of my many broadcasts or articles on the subject, or mentioned this to me in conversation or during a radio show call-in. Yet Ronson apparently wants to convince us that most people who dispute the official story of 9/11 accept the official story of 7/7. This is so obviously, absurdly false that it qualifies as a baldface lie.

Within a page of telling us that 7/7 skeptics blame an accidental power-surge, Ronson changes his story: Now they believe “the bus hadn’t really exploded. It was actually a fake stunt, using fancy pyrotechnics and stuntmen and actors and special-effect blood.” Again, this is an absurd caricature of the actual beliefs of 7/7 skeptics. What could possibly lead Ronson to make up such ridiculous stuff? Is the 7/7 truth movement’s real position – that the London bombings, like 9/11, were false-flag attacks designed to demonize Muslims and incite a “clash of civilizations” – so psychologically threatening, so anxiety-producing, that Ronson’s mind automatically generates a smokescreen of gibberish to save him from having to face what these people really believe?

In case we didn’t hear him the first time, Ronson repeats the absurdity by describing a 7/7 truth meeting as follows: A speaker insists that “7/7 never happened. It was a lie. There were vigorous nods from the crowd” (188).

After lying about the 7/7 truth movement’s position in such astoundingly delusional fashion, Ronson produces exhibit A for his brief that “conspiracy theorists are crazy”: David Shayler. Ronson suggests that Shayler’s beliefs that 9/11 and 7/7 were inside jobs, and his later announcement that he is the messiah, are symptoms of the same underlying madness.

Ronson showed, in The Men Who Stare at Goats, that intelligence agencies are run by psychopaths who drug people to drive them mad, torture innocent people to death in mind-control experiments, and murder their fellow operatives to cover such things up. Yet it doesn’t seem to have occurred to him that Shayler, a renegade MI-5 agent who exposed MI-6′s murderous scheming with al-Qaeda, might have been slipped a dose of something by his former colleagues; i.e. that Shayler was perfectly sane when he exposed his government’s orchestration of al-Qaeda plots and spoke the truth about 9/11 and 7/7, but had been rendered crazy by the time he announced he was the Messiah. Ronson’s failure to even entertain this rather obvious possibility raises questions about his own mental health.
Immediately after his bizarrely mendacious descriptions of 7/7 skeptics, Ronson relates his outrage at seeing the skeptics’ internet discussion thread entitled Jon Ronson: Shill or Stupid? His inability to understand why someone who paints such a ludicrously false and defamatory picture of 7/7 skeptics would be considered shill or stupid suggests that Ronson himself may suffer from a selective deficit of empathy.

But what is the nature of that empathy deficit? Why does Ronson, who feels badly about being a little bit unfair to his other subjects, not even notice that he is being wildly unfair to 7/7 skeptics?

A possible clue:

On page 195, David Shayler tells Ronson: “A viewpoint arrived at without evidence is prejudice. To say Muslims carried out 7/7 – those three guys from Leeds and one from Aylesbury – to say they did it is RACIST, Jon. It’s racist. It’s racist. You’re being RACIST to Muslims if you think they carried out that attack on the evidence there.” Ronson responds: “Oh, fuck off.”

Now let’s be just a little bit honest here. Ronson is Jewish. It has been my extensive experience with Jews in the US, UK and France that the Jewish community is pervaded by unbelievably extreme, rabid Islamophobia. Yes, there are plenty of exceptions; I feature dozens of them on my radio show. But back in the (pre-9/11) days when I was dating Jewish women, working for Jewish employers in such places as New Jersey, Paris, and San Francisco, taking courses from Jewish professors beside Jewish graduate students, writing for student and alternative newspapers dominated by Jews, and generally hanging out more with Jews than with goys, I quickly learned that the vast majority of the dozens of Jews I hung around with were strongly bigoted against Arabs and Muslims.

I never saw comparable Islamophobia from non-Jews…until 9/11. Since then, the non-Jews have become just about as Islamophobic as the Jews were even before 9/11. Which, of course, was the main achievement of 9/11. Why Osama and 19 young Arabs wanted that is just one of those eternal mysteries.

Now I’m not saying that just because Jon Ronson is Jewish he, too, is probably bigoted against Muslims; inclined to blame Muslims for 9/11 and 7/7  without critically examining the evidence; and unconsciously afraid of what might happen to Jews if it turns out that 9/11 and 7/7 were perpetrated by the people who benefited from them. I’m not saying that, am I? Well, maybe I am.
Let’s keep being a little bit honest: As former CIA Bin Laden Project Head Michael Scheuer says, the US and UK have been dragged into what is, at bottom, a religious war in the Middle East: A war between Jews and Muslims over Palestine. It is perfectly natural that Jews should be prejudiced against Muslims, and vice-versa.

Jon, you’re neither shill nor stupid; you’re a good guy; you just haven’t quite transcended your milieu. I forgive you.

* * *

When I first saw Simon Baron-Cohen’s The Science of Evil on my library’s new books shelf, I figured it was Borat’s attempt to one-up Ronson – an even more over-the-top dark comedy about psychopathy. I imagined Borat traveling around Europe administering psychopathy tests and enemas, on-camera, to nobility and royalty.

But it turned out to be a straight-faced scientific treatise. Simon Baron-Cohen, I learned, is actually Sacha Baron-Cohen’s (Borat’s) nerdy cousin – an expert in brain pathology, especially the types of brain malfunction linked to psychopathy and other empathy-deficit-disorders.

That struck me as interesting, because Sacha Baron-Cohen’s Borat seemed to me to be a walking, talking empathy-deficit disorder. It wasn’t just that he doesn’t give a hoot about hurting the innocent bystanders he films in his stunts and turns into the butts of his jokes (which is sort of what Ronson does too, only Ronson worries about it and tries not to be TOO unfair to anyone except truthers). The problem is that the maker of Borat pretends to give us lessons about the evils of persisting anti-Semitism – yet the whole film is one big, vile, anti-Muslim, anti-Kazak stereotype! Imagine a Muslim filmmaker dressing up as a “stupid, greedy Jew from Israel” and doing a Borat-style comedy in reverse. To say that he’d never work in this or any other town again would be an understatement.

You’d think that Simon Baron-Cohen, M.D., the specialist in empathy-deficit disorders, would be curious about whatever empathy-deficit disorder permitted his cousin Sacha to make what must be the most offensive, insensitive, hyper-bigoted “comic” film in history. (Okay, I admit it, it WAS funny.) Here’s what Dr. Simon says about Borat:

“(Hitler’s Final Solution) shows how dangerous it can be if small un-empathic acts go unnoticed. My cousin Sacha (whose comic character Borat exposed contemporary anti-Semitism by posing as an anti-Semite himself) quotes Cambridge historian Ian Kershaw’s chilling phrase: ‘The path to Auschwitz was paved with indifference.’”

What colossal indifference, what monumental lack of empathy can blind both Sacha and Simon Baron-Cohen to the way Borat appears to a Muslim from Kazakhstan, who will spend the rest of his life hearing tittering references to Borat every time he mentions his homeland? Can even a psychopathic level of lack of empathy explain the inability of the Baron-Cohens to see that Israel is the genocidal aggressor, and Palestine the victim, in that “conflict”?

While correctly arguing that lack of empathy is a cause, and empathy a potential cure, of the Zionist-Palestinian conflict (the core of the much broader global war between Jews and Muslims), Simon Baron-Cohen is apparently unable to see that from the perspective of Palestinians, Muslims, and indeed all neutral informed observers, this is a conflict between evil (hyper-tribalistic genocidal invaders from across the seas, driven by ancient religious myth) and good (people fighting to save their children and homeland from the aforementioned invaders). As long as one empathizes equally with both sides, AND seeks out the relevant facts, this is the inevitable conclusion one draws.

But Baron-Cohen, like so many liberal Jews, invokes a false symmetry between the two sides of the Zionist-Palestinian conflict – a false symmetry that is just as offensive as dismissing the Holocaust as a tragic Nazi-Judea conflict, in which atrocities were committed by both sides, neither side was right, etc. etc. Look at how Baron-Cohen constructs his false-symmetry: “Our inclination might be to condemn a suicide bomber who comes over the border from Gaza into Jerusalem…but if we applied the same logic, we would also have to condemn Nelson Mandela…Equally, we would have to condemn Menachem Begin when he…blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on July 22nd, 1946, killing ninety-one people and injuring forty-six others…” (167)

In fact, all sane people must condemn Begin much more harshly than the Palestinian bomber or Nelson Mandela, for the same reason they would condemn Dr. Mengele more harshly than a participant in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. It is a question of who is the aggressor, and who is the victim. In the Zionist-Palestinian conflict, it is not Palestinian Muslims who have militarily invaded New York, massacred Jews by the hundreds of thousands, and attempted to set up an ethnically-cleansed Islamic State there. It is, rather, American and European Jews who have invaded, occupied, and ethnically-cleansed Palestine – a land that has been Islamic virtually ever since the religion of Islam existed. It is rather as if Arab Muslims were to invade Rome and ethnically-cleanse the Italian peninsula of Christians through starvation, mass-murder, and confinement to de facto concentration camps. Christians would never accept that; and neither will Muslims ever accept an apartheid, ethnically-cleansed Jewish State in Palestine.

So let us ask Dr. Baron-Cohen: What part of the Jewish brain is malfunctioning to produce this widespread empathy-deficit disorder that has infected not only Jewish people themselves, but also other Westerners whose culture comes from Jewish-dominated media?

“Tania Singer…found that both men and women activate their cAAC/MCC and AI when they see someone in pain whom they regard as fair and like. Interestingly, men on average showed less activity in this part of the empathy circuit when they see someone in pain whom they regard as unfair or who they do not like. It is as if men find it easier to switch off their empathy for those who might be competitors, or who they judge are out of line, or with whom they have no vested interest in remaining in a relationship” (34).

1 shot 2 kills - the unofficial IDF motto - is an obvious  symptom of genocidal empathy-deficit disorder 


Do Jews, on average, tend to have a similar brain mechanism for switching off their empathy for “those who might be competitors,” meaning potential enemies of the tribe? Might Jon Ronson be unable to understand and empathize with the actual beliefs of truth movement participants because the truth might include Zionist involvement in 9/11 – a horrific prospect from the Zionist and Jewish perspectives, a prospect that kindles atavistic fears of pogroms? Is Sacha Baron-Cohen unable to perceive his gargantuan affront to Kazakhs and Muslims for the same reasons? And is Simon Baron-Cohen’s obsession with the evil of the Nazis, blindness to the evil of the Zionists, and blindness to his own cousin’s massive lack of compassion, a product of the same mechanism?

"To Gaza with love" - Israel kids sign missiles that will blow Palestinian kids to bits
In asking these questions, and in criticizing the blind spot shared by Ronson and the Baron-Cohens, I am not arguing against the overall value of the two books. The Psychopath Test is a fine work, funny and humane and self-aware and outrageously funny. And The Science of Evil, with its recognition that empathy is an extremely valuable limited resource, is an important contribution to the literature of the psychopathy-empathy spectrum. And besides, the empathy test at the back – prefigured by Philip K. Dick in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep – is loads of fun! (I scored a very respectable 54, which translates as “slightly above average.”)

So by all means, read these books! But don’t miss their critically-important blind spots.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

The New World Order: Ben Gurion's "One True Zion" ?



What exactly is the "New World Order"?

There is  talk in conspiracy circles about a bankster plot to reduce the world to slavery.

Unfortunately, the conspiracy theorists are right. John Perkins, in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man and subsequent books, offers convincing first-hand testimony of his exploits in service to the New World Order bankster conspiracy.

Listen to my interview with Economic Hit Man John Perkins: http://mp3.wtprn.com/Barrett/0801/20080115_Tue_Barrett1.mp3

Perkins explains that his employers - big international banksters - are creating the world's first "empire of debt." They are using unpayable debt as their prime weapon to build the first empire encompassing the entire world.

Perkins explains how the banksters would send him to visit key ministers, and sometimes even heads of state, of targeted countries. He would make them an offer they couldn't refuse: Silver in one hand, or lead in the other. Do you want a fistful of c-notes or a bullet? Take this usurious loan and reduce your nation to debt slavery, or you will be killed.

If the foreign leader refused to accept the banksters' usurious loan, Perkins would go home. A short while later, the foreign leader would die from a plane crash or heart attack or bullet or cancer or what-have-you. The guys responsible - the "asteroids" - are the world's highest-paid hit men. Perkins knows some of them personally.

It's important to note that we're not talking about the CIA here.  The CIA's government-scale pay is peanuts compared to what guys like Perkins earn. Though the "asteroids" may moonlight for CIA "cowboys" (the guys in the Agency who play fast and loose with the rules) the New World Order plan is run by private bankster intelligence networks that are lavishly-funded and above the law. These "rogue networks" have placed "moles" in key government agencies and throughout the police, military and judiciary as well as the private sector. Webster Tarpley calls the biggest one "THE rogue network" and blames it for 9/11.

That would be the Rogue Network behind the New World Order.

But what exactly IS the game plan of the New World Order?

George H.W. Bush announced the coming of the New World Order on September 11th, 1991.



 Exactly ten years later, a byzantine plot redolent with Masonic symbolism destroyed the World Trade Center.

The expression "New World Order" offers a clue: Bush was talking about a long-term plan to dominate the world from a headquarters in the Americas, the "New World" (as opposed to Europe, Asia and Africa, the "Old World.")

This is exactly the same idea expressed by the name of the "Project for a New American Century," the group that called for a "new Pearl Harbor" in September, 2000 - and got one exactly one year later.

The same idea is underlined by Brezezinski in The Grand Chessboard (1999), which emphasized that only a Pearl Harbor type event could unite the American public behind ambitious foreign policy goals, and focused on the difficulty of ruling the world system (whose center is Eurasia) from North America.

The notion that the New World, the Americas, is the "Promised Land" - i.e. the Biblical Zion - has a long history. The myth of America as the "promised land" justified the genocide of the Native Americans. It underlies the various permutations of American exceptionalism, the philosophy (or rather, theology) that dominates American political science.

Let's pause for a quick recap of the Zion myth. The story is that the Chosen People are subjected to trials and tribulations, exiles and pogroms, until finally they arrive at their Promised Land - the land of milk and honey. According to one Biblical version, they have to commit genocide, by slaying all of the Philistine (Palestinian) men, women, and children, in order to take possession of the Promised Land.

Christians invoked this myth as they committed genocide against the peoples of the New World. Some Jews, including rabbis who contributed to the Talmud, invoked the same myth as they argued that God intended for Jews to take over the world and rule the goyim (non-Jews) like cattle, using and disposing of them at will.

The New World of the Americas, with its vast resources and easy-to-conquer population, makes  a great "promised land of milk and honey."

I submit that the New World Order is a freemasonic effort to establish Zion in the Americas, and from that fortress, to dominate the world.

But who's behind it?

Adrian Salbuchi says it's a network of big banking families - many of whom are ethnically Jewish and prime bankrollers of the state of Israel. These banking families, led by the Rothschilds, strong-armed the British government to issue the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and laid the basis for the Zionist takeover of Palestine.

During his recent interview on Truth Jihad Radio, Salbuchi told me that the Zionists are getting ready to move their empire from Occupied Palestine to the Americas. Salbuchi confirmed earlier reports from Joe Vialls (see below) and others that the Falkand Islands region contains more than ten times the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia - and nearby Antarctica contains even more. He said the Zionists, with their financial clout and dominance of the big oil majors, have taken control of the Argentine oil industry. Additionally, according to Salbuchi, swarms of Israeli operatives have been scouting out the vast, unoccupied, fertile regions of Argentina in preparation for a possible Zionist invasion…I mean, emigration.

Listen to Adrian Salbuchi on Truth Jihad Radio (2nd half of the mp3): http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-042512.mp3

Christopher Bollyn offers another perspective on the Zionist takeover of the Americas. Bollyn has first-hand knowledge of the extent of Zionist power in the USA, having been driven into permanent exile by them. His story is rather amazing.

Bollyn was one of the first American journalists to investigate the real story behind 9/11. In 2006, while sitting in his backyard in Chicago, he was attacked, brutalized, stunned with a 50,000 volt taser, and arrested by local police for no apparent reason - then charged with assaulting the police! Brought before a corrupt, mobbed-up court run by a Zionist judge, he didn't stand a chance. Getting the message, Bollyn and his family fled the country and have been in exile ever since. To his credit, he hasn't stopped fighting back by pursuing the truth. His book Solving 9/11 is an indispensable resource.

Bollyn argues that American freemasonry, and with it the top tier of organized crime, is dominated by an exclusively Jewish freemasonic lodge, the Bnai Brith. This, he suggests, is the pinnacle of the New World Order power pyramid.

Listen to Christopher Bollyn on Truth Jihad Radio (2nd half of the mp3): http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-042012.mp3

I think Adrian Salbuchi is 100% credible, and Christopher Bollyn - though he sometimes gets overly excited about personal enemies (don't we all) - is generally credible as well as fearless and trail-blazing.

But what about Joe Vialls?

Vialls, who died of a suspicious heart attack on 2005, blamed the October 2002 Bali bombing on an Israeli mini-nuke. At the time, I wasn't convinced. Vialls seemed like a bit of a loose cannon. But since then, I've heard multiple independent confirmations of the Israeli mini-nuke theory from folks here at Veterans Today. Maybe Vialls wasn't so crazy after all.

In the article reproduced below - published in December 2003 - Vialls offers a fascinating interpretation of the "New World Order." He suggests that the one true Zion of the Zionists has always been "fortress America," not Palestine.

Maybe that's why the Zionist-dominated Department of Homeland Security feels the need to order 450 million hollow-point bullets.

Call me paranoid.

But these days, if you're not paranoid, you've got to be crazy.

-KB

* * *
Ben Gurion’s Ultimate“One True Zion”

Copyright Joe Vialls, 14 December 2003

It was always night when they came, a certainly that made Palestinian women huddle nervously inside their small houses until the sun rose high in the sky the following day. Sometimes there was a hint of an advance warning, perhaps animals moving restlessly, or olive trees rustling when there was no wind, but this morning there was no time to prepare and no time to hide their helpless children. Armed with weapons stolen from British soldiers whose throats were cut while they slept, Irgun, Stern and Haganah terrorists slipped silently into the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin at dawn. Led by war criminal Menachem Begin, this Zionist scum from the ghettos and gutters of Europe flitted from house to house, committing unspeakable atrocities and laughing aloud as the defenseless women tried to resist.

When they finally tired of this sport, Irgun, Stern and Haganah terrorists alike opened fire, their stolen British bullets ripping through the vulnerable flesh of unarmed Palestinians. By noon that same day, 9 April 1948, just over 200 Palestinians lay dead in Deir Yassin, more than half of them women and children. But the terrorists were not quite finished. Next, they loaded 25 unarmed male survivors on trucks and paraded them around the Zakhron Yosef quarter in Jerusalem. It was a display of absolute Zionist power, showing all and sundry who was really in control of Palestine.

It could have ended there, but the Zionists had something more spectacular in mind: a lesson to all others who might dare to stand in their way, then or at any time in the future. The 25 unarmed survivors were driven to a stone quarry near Givat Shaul, where they were made to kneel, before Irgun and Stern terrorists took it in turns to fire single bullets into the back of each head. The lifeless bodies were then kicked into shallow graves.

These were the “Shock and Awe” tactics of David Ben Gurion, founding father of both Zionism and global terrorism. Though obviously clinically insane, this was the man who first drew up the plan for “Zion”, a “Promised Land for the Jews”, which most global citizens erroneously believed, and still believe, to be Palestine. But even as the first Jewish State was being formally declared in 1948, the arrogant Ben Gurion made it very clear that Palestine was not to be the one true Zion. Despite continual frantic urgings by religious Jews, he insisted that this first conquest be called “Yisrael”, and that its citizens, be they Jewish or not, would forever be called “Yisraelim”.

The final Zion, or Promised Land, would be determined by raw wealth and power rather than by mere religious symbolism. While intentionally leaking “false Zions” including Australia and Argentina to the media, Ben Gurion and his Zionist cohorts ultimately intended to overrun and capture the Americas The problem was that back in 1948 they had no real power, and would have been easily overwhelmed by the vast resources of the U.S. Military in particular. So conquest of the “one true Zion” was to be a long drawn-out game, with Zionists lobbies in America gradually eating away at the fabric of society. Then, when resistance in the Americas was eventually undermined to a predetermined level, it would be time to strike militarily. Believe me, that time is now very close.

It is easy to imagine the indignation caused by this statement, no doubt accompanied by shrill cries from the Zionist lobbies in New York and Washington demanding fully-referenced “academic proof” of this obscene covert plan. Naturally there is no academic proof, because, as with other plans involving massive deception of the western public, intelligence agencies and lobbies always grade the details “Top Secret” or higher.

A good example of this is “Operation Northwoods”, a 1962 plan designed to give the U.S. Administration extraordinary powers over the people, using only a series of deceptions generated by Americans for use against other Americans. Northwoods had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the American Joint Chiefs of Staff. The plan called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere.

Under Northwoods, people would be framed for bombings they did not commit; and planes would be hijacked. But despite the deranged audacity of its plans, for more than thirty years not a single American citizen had the slightest idea that Operation Northwoods even existed. Remember, the simple fact that you do not know about the plan, is not proof the plan does not exist.

The only way to obtain information as sensitive as that laid out in “Fortress Americas ”, is to have direct or indirect access to a disgruntled source or sources at the very top of the Zionist chain of command; access which I proved existed back in January 2002. On the 30th of that month I published “Operation Shekhinah”, an eyes-only highly classified Zionist plan to capture Iraq’s oil reserves and re-route them through to Haifa in Israel. I provided significant details and actual pipeline routes, but, as fully expected, came in for a fearful hammering from thousands of people who clearly thought I had gone insane. This reaction was fully expected at the time, because who on earth would believe such a detailed plan without “proper” academic accreditation?

There was only one reason for publishing “Operation Shekhinah” in January 2002, and that was to get an official Internet time/date stamp on the report, more than a year before George W. Bush suddenly and apparently spontaneously decided to illegally invade Iraq, allegedly because of its “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. It was not until after the gun smoke started to clear, and no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, that the true Zionist objective of the invasion became clear.

Within months, Israeli and American newspaper started calling for old pipelines from Iraq to Haifa to be “reopened” for economic benefit. This proved that my Operation Shekhinah of January 2002 was horribly real, and, more importantly, proved I was either endowed with quite extraordinary extra-sensory perception, or had access to the very top of the Zionist chain of command. Rest assured I do not have any powers of extra-sensory perception, meaning my credibility is now independently assured by unemotional fully-automatic Internet time/date stamps.

Before we return to the subject at hand, viz. the total subordination of the Americas as we know them today, it would be prudent to insert a short paragraph on that old bogey “Anti-Semitism”, in its revised and inaccurate form meaning “anti-Jew”. No doubt a few thousand idiots may tag me with this meaningless media label some time soon, but this would probably be a serious error of judgement.

As you will read later in this multi-part Fortress Americas report, some of the first targets of the Zionist hunter-killer teams in North and South America will be prominent Jews, who do not see eye-to-eye with their crazed Zionist brethren, thus rendering them higher priority targets than even the leaders of various hostile American militias. If I was an “anti-Semite’, then no doubt I would lock “Fortress Americas” securely in a cupboard, chuckle insanely, buy a giant bucket of popcorn, and then sit back in Australia waiting for the pre-emptive strikes to start on television.

Although Ben Gurion did not start drawing up detailed strategies until the twentieth century, Fortress Americas existed in outline form nearly a hundred years earlier, when plans were made to introduce an exclusively Jewish-controlled series of Masonic Lodges across North and South America. In less than fifty years, the new “B’nai B’rith” series of lodges managed to penetrate, dominate, and thus direct all important aspects of western Masonry, in particular the 33rd Degree and Royal Arch.

The choice of the name “B’nai B’rith” was inspired, because it mirrored that of a secular Jewish fraternal organization which later went on to become more commonly known as the “Anti-Defamation League”, a bunch of powerful head-kickers famed for their attacks on anyone daring to mouth even mild dissent against Jews in general. Thus if at any time there was suspicion about possible “B’nai B’rith” subversion or outright terrorism in North or South America, the fraternal organization would automatically lash out in a hasty knee jerk reaction, thereby unwittingly protecting its “mirror” Masonic brethren. The importance of these covert American B’nai B’rith terrorist-coordinating cells cannot be overstated, and will be covered in more detail later in this report

As most readers are already aware, Ben Gurion’s “Yisrael” has absolutely nothing to do with Jewish religious heritage, or the “right of return” to a homeland claimed solely on the basis of unprovable religious babble. Certainly thousands of religious fanatics bang their heads against a stone wall below the al-Aqsâ Mosque in Jerusalem every day, but they are only there to provide local color for the media cameras. Yisrael was and is to the Zionists what Omaha Beach was to the Americans during World War II - merely a beachhead from which to launch deep penetrating attacks into enemy territory to the east, ultimately to Abadan and beyond, thereby securing the incredibly rich crude oil reserves of the Middle East. Those oil riches would then in turn arm and equip the new Zionists legions need to move on to their ultimate target, the one true Zion called the Americas.

The problem was that countries like Britain and Russia kept getting in the way of these covert ambitions. In the very beginning, the British tried to keep these Zionist terrorists out of Palestine but were eventually outvoted by the new powerful America, which dutifully bleated time and again that, “The Jews must have a home land”. The British could see what was coming, but they were powerless to stop it happening. Later on the Russians took over responsibility for deterrence, neatly blocking the intended Zionist expansion by judiciously positioning tactical nuclear weapons in Syria and Egypt.

Thus there was stalemate in the Middle East for nearly thirty years, with the Zionists effectively stalled by lack of direct control over the oil assets. Back then this was acceptable to the Zionists, because the Shah of Iran was quietly providing Israel with all the free oil it needed for its local warlike behavior, and Yisraelim Zionists started to pay more attention to beach volley ball than to the ultimate conquest of the one true Zion. With the fall of the Shah in 1979 and the cessation of free Iranian oil supplies, everyone woke up with a fearful jolt, realizing that now was the time to start making serious long-term preparations for the invasion of the Americas.

At the end of 1979 it was considered that completion of the prerequisites for invasion would take about another twenty-five years, because there were a considerable number of tasks at hand. Unable to trust Russia in the medium to long term, the Zionists wanted American taxpayers to pre-equip the one true Zion with a workable intercontinental missile defense shield, placing them well beyond the reach of the Russians at any time in the future. They also wanted a comprehensive survey of all energy resources, because once in place, Fortress Americas had to be 100% self sufficient in oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy.

There were also other less academic considerations. At best is was envisaged that up to 250,000 Zionists made up of four and six-man covert “Mistaravim” hunter-killer teams would be inserted into the Americas using various subterfuges, but this was still a very small number when compared with the massive strength of existing armies in North and South America. Even with the element of complete surprise the odds were against success, so supplementary plans were then added to biologically cripple at least fifty-percent of active-service United States military units, and disarm the civilian populations of North and South America, after staging a comprehensive series of high-profile “lone nut” massacres in school yards and elsewhere. More about these plans later.

Of all considerations, energy was the most important, and by late 1980 a comprehensive top secret survey was under way of the Falkland Islands Continental Shelf, considered by many to be the brightest prospect for a long-term oil supply for Fortress Americas. Though a seven-person cell at British Petroleum was used as an untraceable front, the actual survey was conducted by American energy corporation S***, which could barely believe the awesome results, which were checked again twice for good measure.

There was no mistake. According to the comprehensive survey conducted with state-of-the-art equipment, The Falklands Shelf conservatively contained slightly more than ten times the total oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Beyond doubt, this was the largest agglomeration of crude oil on the face of the earth, and the data that proved it immediately attracted a security rating to match. This was Zionist heaven, and absolutely no one outside the loop was allowed even a sniff of this staggering information.

Then in one of those gargantuan mistakes that defy rational explanation, a full set of the seismic and other data was shipped to the British Petroleum “front” cell, whose members were most certainly not on the Zionist list of properly “approved people”. Some of the data were photocopied out of interest amid loud “Oohs” and Ahhs” generated by the mind-numbing figures, but the photocopying turned out to be a serious mistake. By 1989 all but two of the British people who had access to this extraordinary information met with fatal accidents. Of the two survivors, one changed names and moved to a different industry, while I chose exile in a sleepy Australian backwater.

Talking America into spending billions on a missile defense shield took longer than the energy survey, but during March 1983 President Ronald Reagan addressed the National Association of Evangelicals and called the Soviet Union “the Evil Empire”. Like George Dubya and his various speeches twenty years later about Iraqi “democracy”, Ronnie was just warming up in front of his pro-Zionist evangelical audience. Then two weeks later he delivered a national security speech and called upon “the scientific community in this country, who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents to the cause of mankind and world peace; to give us the means of rendering these weapons impotent and obsolete.”

The fix was in, and two years later the Strategic Defence InitiativeSDI was born, designed to develop kinetic missiles, laser beam weapons, electromagnetic rail guns, and a host of other assorted pieces of space junk. The problem was that nobody had the slightest idea how to make such a complex integrated system work. In very short order, America farmed out some important SDI contracts to British defense companies, who were known to be leading lights in certain areas absolutely critical to the success of the desired “one true Zion” missile shield.

Some but not all of these Marconi and other British defense sub-contractors were allowed access to certain classified American defense computers, as an integral part of their SDI work, which would have been fine if they were the only scientists tapping into the data. Unfortunately they were not, and perhaps because they did not know how to navigate around inside the American systems, three and possibly four British scientists found themselves connected to Zionist computers on the other side of cyber space.

What the scientists discovered, at least in part, were sections of advanced strategic and tactical plans for Fortress Americas. One scientist mistakenly thought it was all part of the SDI scenario, while another thought it was just a practical joke. The reality was quite different. Zionists computer scientists working on Fortress Americas had hacked into the American defense systems looking for classified information, and had made the hideous mistake of doing so while using computer platforms which contained critical details about Fortress Americas.

The cat was almost out of the bag, but the Zionists swiftly thought of a way of shutting everything down again. As you would expect, the solution to the “problem” was both chilling and obscene, as befits the maniacs who have every intention of turning the United States of America into their personal headquarters.

It is perhaps time for all Americans, Canadians, and the residents of South America to wake up. The real enemy does not reside in the back blocks of Afghanistan, or underground in dark bunkers below Tikrit. Though his preferred accommodation was razed to the ground on 11 September 2001, the real enemy is still alive and well, living high on the hog in New York City.

Yisraelim Prepare for the Invasion of America


Before delving any further into the detailed contingencies for Fortress Americas, it is necessary to briefly review the overall scope and sheer audacity of the Zionist plan, because this is the only way of understanding what comes next. In essence, the entire American continent, from Inuvik in northern Canada to the southern tip of Tierra Del Fuego, is to be invaded and captured for Zionist use, with the cabal exercising central command and control from New York City, currently located in the much smaller United States of America. Within this new massive fortress, the USA will be the focal point of all significant economic activities, with Canada and the former countries of Latin and South America providing the bulk of natural resources and cheap labor.

Initial military activity will consist of approximately 250,000 Mistaravim-trained Yisraelim terrorists entering the Americas by land, sea and air, thereafter splitting into cells of between four and six men, every one of them coordinated internally by various designated lodges of the B'nai B'rith Masonic order. At the same time, a further smaller block of 10,000 Yisraelim terrorists will enter Australia in order to capture and hold strategic mineral reserves, though this is an entirely separate operation that will not impact directly on the Americas. Beyond that point, strategic planning calls for the U.S. military to obey the orders of the Zionist cabal through its Yisraelim commanders, and then be used in turn as a blunt instrument to enforce 'order' across the new Fortress Americas.

Back in New York well before the invasion proper commenced, the Zionist cabal wanted American taxpayers to pre-equip the one true Zion with a workable intercontinental missile defense shield, placing them well beyond the reach of hostile nuclear weapons in the future. The cabal also wanted a comprehensive survey of all energy resources on the American continent, because once it became an independent entity, Fortress Americas had to be one-hundred-percent self sufficient in all forms of energy.

Studies of energy reserves in the United States, combined with those in Canada, Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil, which would be forcibly requisitioned after the invasion, proved that existing reserves would be woefully inadequate to even protect Fortress Americas from external attack. Because of this, the search for enhanced reserves in the Americas assumed top priority, and in late 1979 a vast two-year seismic survey of the South American Continental Shelf was commissioned through a Zionist front company in The United States, with much emphasis placed on the extended Continental Shelf surrounding the Falkland Islands.

The Falklands survey was successful beyond the wildest dreams of the Zionist cabal, indicating overall oil reserves under the Falklands Continental Shelf more than ten times as large as those existing in Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately the British administered the Falklands, and New York was determined that London would not be allowed to interfere with this staggering oil discovery, which by itself was sufficient to drive Fortress Americas for a hundred years or more. The problem was how to rid themselves of the British presence in the Falklands.

After considerable thought on the matter, the Zionist cabal finally acted on 19 March 1982, sending a hand-carried top-secret communiqué to the Argentine Government, which contained a doctored version of the Falklands report showing "about half the oil reserves as those existing in Saudi Arabia", and urging the Argentines to act quickly in regaining their birthright. It was a fine calculation, based on Britain being unwilling to react to an oil find of this particular magnitude, but sent in the certain knowledge that the Argentines would react, as indeed they did. Seven days later on 26 March 1982 the Argentine Government decided on an invasion date, and seven days after that, on 2 April 1982, Argentine forces captured and occupied the Falkland Islands.

The Zionist cabal was delighted because it knew full well that the Argentine Government could later be bought off or exterminated, with the massive Falklands oil reserves subsequently being added to Fortress Americas energy assets. But the cabal's delight was to be short-lived, because the Zionists were still unaware that copies of the real report had been accidentally circulated to a small number of people at British Petroleum in London. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher had therefore been watching Argentina like a hawk for five months, and responded to the expected invasion within three days of the capture of Stanley, dispatching a large battle fleet from Britain on 5 April 1982. France provided significant assistance with the British recovery of the Falklands, though French involvement was very discreet, and never officially disclosed to the media.

The importance of this British defeat of Argentine forces in the Falklands cannot be overstated. In order to take the Americas at all, the Zionist cabal needed massive combat oil supplies far in excess of those already existing in north and south America, meaning that plans had to be revised to include conquest of the Middle East oilfields first. It was precisely this requirement that later spawned Operation Shekhinah and Operation Iraqi Freedom, though we do not need to examine either of those latter plans here. Both have been reported on extensively by the author, and links to each can be found at the bottom of this page.

By far the most pressing requirement for Fortress Americas was that of 'blooding' at least 275,000 Yisraelim terrorists, and then raising their combat skills to approximately the same level as that of the American Delta Force or the British SAS. Ultimately these terrorists would form the core of the invasion force, and be required to operate as thousands of small independent 4-6 man cells with complete confidence, a task well beyond the abilities of even the best trained conventional soldiers. Clearly paper targets were no good for this training, and there were only a limited number of Palestinian women and children targets available in the territories.

The Yisraelis could not fan out to the east without risking a catastrophic response from Russia, so they took the only course available. On 6 June 1982 they moved north into the Lebanon, determined to blood their young inexperienced soldiers and magically transform them into Yisraelim terrorists in less than six months. With each battalion under the watchful eye of two experienced MistaravimYisraeli Civilian Special Forces, the young soldiers were instructed in the special art of Jewish warfare, where all Goyim non-Jews deserve to die.

Over the months that followed, thousands of Lebanese died in many horrible ways, with the Mistaravim instructors driving their young Yisraeli pupils on to greater and greater numbers of murders, and other gross human rights excesses. Headed throughout by Yisraeli 'defense minister' Ariel Sharon, the murders and gang-rapes peaked in September 1982, less than a month after a token multinational peace keeping force arrived in the Lebanon, when more than 2,000 unarmed Palestinians civilians were murdered by Yisraelim terrorists in less than a single week at the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla.

By his orders and actions, war criminal Sharon was making a deliberate point: The Yisraelim would rape or murder whichever Goyim they chose, whenever they chose, as was their 'legal entitlement' under the insane 'laws' of the Babylonian Talmud. In the words of the master war criminal himself, The Lebanon and Beirut in particular were "wonderful training grounds", but the sheer level of brutal savagery at Sabra and Shatilla ensured growing attention by the international community, and over the Christmas period, the multinational peace keeping force more than doubled in size, headed by the Americans and French.

The Zionists were furious when the multinational peace keeping force invaded their new training ground, and on 18 April 1983 they bombed the American Embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people. Then on 23 October the Zionists detonated two Dimona micro nukes outside the American and French marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 and 58 soldiers respectively. The multinational peace keeping force swiftly retreated, leaving the Lebanese people as live targets for Mistaravim and other Zionist kill-teams wishing to hone their lethal skills.

This was the first documented use of Yisraeli micro nukes outside Palestine, but it was not to be the last. Most notable of the new low-radiation micro nukes used overseas during later years for practice, reprisals and covert operations, were three detonated in London and a fourth in Bali. Intelligence received in 2003 indicates that Dimona has so far manufactured in excess of 600 of these exotic weapons. Most micro nukes remain in Palestine, though 220 have allegedly been pre-positioned in North and South America, with a further six deployed to Western Australia.

Though the Yisraelis had already managed to butcher most of the Palestinian refugees in The Lebanon, they were attacked by an increasing number of outraged Lebanese, and by the Hizbollah, a new counter-insurgency army formed and funded by Syria and Iran, specifically to drive the Yisraeli terrorists out of Lebanese sovereign territory. By mid 1985 the Hizbollah gathered strength and efficiency, forcing the Yisraelis to withdraw to southern Lebanon, where they formed a new 'occupation zone' for the continued field training of Fortress Americas and other terrorist personnel. Between 1985 and 2000, more than 100,000 Yisraelim terrorists were 'blooded' in the south Lebanon occupation zone, until direct threats from Russia forced them to withdraw completely. And so it was that at exactly 0341 hrs GMT on 24 May 2000, the last Yisraeli tank left the Lebanon, crossing through the Fattier Gate back into Palestine.

Unfortunately, this upset the advanced Fortress Americas training program, so the Zionist cabal in New York ordered war criminal Sharon to "provoke the Palestinians in the territories", a task he completed with gusto just over four months later on 28 September 2000, when he deliberately invaded and violated the Muslim al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Predictably and understandably, Sheik Ahmed Yasin, the spiritual leader of Hamas, said that "the visit of leader of the extreme rightist Likud party Ariel Sharon to the al-Aqsa mosque, expresses the spirit of terrorism, criminality and assault to the sacred places."

Of course it did, and this was exactly what the Zionist cabal intended. Having provoked the Palestinians into throwing a few stones at a handful of checkpoints, the Yisraeli terrorists responded with light and heavy automatic rifles and machine guns, 120-mm tank guns, helicopter gunships, and even F-16 fighter-bombers. All weapon systems were graciously donated free by Americans, in order that the Yisraelis might learn how to later kill Americans efficiently in America, using identical techniques. As I write this report in January 2004, and taking into account all Yisraelim trained earlier in The Lebanon, the Zionist cabal now has in excess of 275,000 terrorists fully trained and combat ready. At least 7,000 of these have already been infiltrated into the USA, and many more will follow during the months to come.

Running in parallel with terrorist training during the late eighties, were detailed plans to severely weaken the US military, to promote a general climate 'conducive to gun control' in the west, and to ensure a defensive missile shield was in place overhead the Americas. . The last-named project was doomed to failure, and despite costing the lives of a number of British defense scientists, "Star Wars" was quietly shelved. Though Bush proposed "Son of Star Wars" in late 2003, there was and is no serious intent to develop a practical missile defense shield. Funds from this latest excess will be discreetly siphoned off by the Federal Reserve and deposited in a number of numbered Swiss and Belgian bank accounts, which in turn will provide substantial pensions for a small number of elitist rats, who are likely to jump the good ship America before the invasion starts.

Detailed preparations for discreet biological warfare against the US Military were made in the late eighties, with Zionist-controlled pharmaceutical corporations developing a very special slow-acting and debilitating vaccine. In 1990 a "war with Iraq" was miraculously arranged by George Bush Senior, with more than half a million American servicemen then forcibly inoculated with the biological toxin during a six month period. The prime reason for this was quite simple. The Yisraelim were not keen to face a hardened and very experienced US military when the time came to invade the Americas, so took pre-emptive action.

Nowadays so many highly experienced American servicemen have died, or been permanently incapacitated by this biological warfare, that the token defense of the Americas will be left in the hands of rookies, reservists, and various American militia. None promises to be much of a match for the hundreds of blooded and highly-trained Yisraelim terrorist cells.

The notion of a 'general climate conducive to gun control' was really only icing on the cake, designed to minimize the level of risk to Yisraeli terrorists from American and other civilians. In this venture the Yisraelis found amazingly helpful allies among the political 'left wing' of the west. Every time a Mistaravim special forces team carried out a "gun massacre" in places as far removed as Scotland and Australia, literally thousands of lefties joined the media clamor for "gun control", thereby actively helping to remove the only real form of defense they had against Yisraeli terrorists in the future. Do not ask me why this is, but I imagine Sigmund Freud would babble on for hours about guns being "phallic symbols" that "frighten civilized people". Maybe so, but a semi-automatic weapon in your house is, in my view, preferable to later sharing the same terrible fate as the poor souls at Sabra and Shatilla.

Naturally the Yisraeli terrorists can only hope to remove a tiny fraction of America's civilian weapons in this way, and therefore already have detailed plans in place for dealing with the Militias and others who might dare to defiantly stand in the way of their imperial conquest. B'nai B'rith has already updated its own super computers with the profiles of all American militia groups, right-wing 'patriotic' activists, and any one else who it is deemed may cause the Zionist cabal problems at a later, including those American Jews who are opposed to the concept of Zion itself.

Unless suitable precautions are taken in advance, all Americans in these categories will only ever see a Yisraeli terrorist once, and then only for the three milliseconds it takes for an expanding high velocity .223 Remington bullet to travel from the muzzle of the sawn-off terrorist M-16, and ride a dazzling red laser beam to a spot directly between their eyes. Death for male activists will therefore be mercifully swift, unlike the degrading fate in store for their mothers, wives, girlfriends, and any female children.

Those American readers who imagine that the invasion and subordination of the Americas will in some way resemble the Hollywood film "Red Dawn", are sadly mistaken and need to revise their views. Unlike the film Red Dawn, where the invaders basically killed half of the people and imprisoned the other half, the Yisraelim invasion and conquest will have more in common with Vichy France during the Second World War. Most politicians will remain in their current jobs, as will vast numbers of public servants and local police forces.

If the Yisraelim invasion succeeds or even partially succeeds, reversing the fate of normal American people afterwards will be next to impossible without an effective two-tier command and control network, ironically very similar in nature to that of the Iraqi counter-insurgency forces today, who are being attacked and murdered wholesale by American troops under the overall direction of the same Zionist cabal in New York.

Now might be a very good time to drag that old reloading press out of the garden shed, and run up a few hundred extra rounds. Load them up to maximum breech pressure with excruciating care, and ensure that each and every hollow point or silver tip bullet is perfectly seated in its case. It is your personal duty to protect your family and neighbors by killing enough Yisraeli terrorist scum to deflect their attention elsewhere, giving you a chance to fight a second day, then another day, and yet another day, until finally you have killed every last one of them.

Monday, May 14, 2012

My latest Press TV interview: 9/11 coup d'etat triggered pre-planned War on Islam

I had a busy weekend on Press TV. 
 

First, yesterday's interview:


War against Muslims started even before 9/11

(watch the video)


Reports about a Virginia military course that taught officers to prepare for a total war on Islam indicate the US right wing agenda even before 9/11, an analyst tells Press TV.

Press TV has interviewed Dr. Kevin Barrett, author of ‘Questioning the War on Terror’ about the orchestrated campaign against Islam since September 11th, 2001.

What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.

Press TV: The Virginia (military) course that was mentioned there in our report has also warned officers between the link of the Muslim Civil Liberties Advocacy organization, which is known as CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) and other such groups, and Hamas, which is referred to as the enemy.

Why have these rights groups been targeted?

Dr. Barrett: Well, that's a good question and another good question is why is Hamas considered America's enemy? Hamas is not opposed to America; Hamas is opposed to Zionists in Israel.

So, this leads us to the real reason for this wave of Islamophobic hysteria that's swept over the USA since 9/11 and that is, to sum it up - September 11th was a coup d'etat by extreme right wing forces in the US military particularly with dispensationalist Christian extremists at the top of the Air Force.

It was overseen by Cheney and the Israeli MOSSAD with its assets in the New York crime scene blew up the World trade Center… and deceptively blamed it on Muslims to launch a war against the religion of Islam.

Today, with these recent revelations, we are only beginning to learn - not we… people like me have know this for a long time, but others that have been in denial about the reality of what really happened on September 11th have just begun to learn how absolutely insane these extreme right wing forces in the USA are.

The good news is that they are being rooted out. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Martin Dempsey has been one of many professional leaders in the US military who are unhappy about the September 11th coup d'etat and the War on Islam. And they are slowly, but surely rooting out these crazed Islamophobic forces.

And yes, these Islamophobes are absolutely committed to going after anybody that defends Islam in any way including those who are using the freedom of speech granted under the US Constitution to defend the religion of Islam.

Press TV: You've written a book on the War on Terror and I'd like to bring this issue up with you, our guest in Washington was suggesting there that this is a war on Islam that has been supported by three sides and this is not just a non-profit organization maybe in the US giving out an extreme view on Islam, but this is a policy that is entrenched in the government and is part of the policy.

Sometimes we even think when we see for instance reports of Qu'ran burning in Afghanistan Islam are attempts to test the nerves of Islam community. What do you think this war on terror is about and has it become, on the ground, a war on Islam?

Dr. Barrett: Actually, the guest in London was absolutely correct that this does go back to before 9/11. I think the war on terror actually began in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International terrorism (JCIT). Netanyahu summoned George H W Bush and Scoop Jackson who was the leading Senate military budget guy and other big time movers and shakers in the US military establishment and policy makers to Jerusalem.

And at that Jerusalem conference on International Terrorism in 1979, before the Cold War was over, they laid out a plan to replace communism with terrorism as the next great enemy.

Now, terrorism should have been put in quotes because what was really going on was that Netanyahu and his people were setting Islam up to be the next great enemy of the West. Why is that? Because Islam - well, not so much the religion of Islam, but the world's 1.5 billion Muslims is an obstacle to Greater Israel.

The Zionists have been stealing more and more land; butchering more and more people; pushing their ethnic cleansing harder and harder all the time. The hardcore Zionists want to take the whole of the Middle East for themselves. They want everything from the Nile to the Euphrates and they want to dominate the rest of it.

And in order to do that they basically have to go to war with Muslims because it so happens that the people who live in that part of the world are Muslims. So the war on terror is really a disguised war on Islam on behalf of radical Zionists led by Benyamin Netanyahu who started the whole thing with the Jerusalem conference on International terrorism back in 1979.

Press TV: Suggesting a nuclear attack to justify the destruction of the holy cities of Medina and Mecca we've heard, Dr. Barrett, it does sound completely radical and we never hear any official trying to justify it let alone repeat it, but nonetheless, how effective are these kinds of ideas in promoting extremist behaviour towards Muslims?

Dr. Barrett: Well, unfortunately they are effective within a small group of extremists who have become ensconced in certain parts of our military as well as some of the Zionists. There are plenty of liberal Zionists who are somewhat horrified by this kind of extreme rhetoric, but who let it pass and  are willing to go along with it because it serves their interests.

Now, we need to step back here for a moment and talk about what would have happened here in the US if for instance we had heard that a US military teacher had drawn up these official documents saying that we might need to have a total war against Jews, on the order of let's say Dachau and Auschwitz.

What would have happened? The American media would have gone bananas and the US army would have been torn apart and everybody involved would have been kicked out.

The US Constitution has a clause, which says that all religions must be treated equally - that's our First Amendment. And so, here in America we need to wake up and put a stop to this kind of extreme Islamophobia that wouldn’t ever be accepted if it were directed against any other group.


* * *




Saturday's interview: 


Saudis seek Nazi-style occupation of Bahrain: Analyst 

(watch the video)


As Saudi Arabia has reportedly thrown its weight behind a plan to unify the six Arab member states of the [Persian] Gulf Cooperation Council, many analysts see the move as Riyadh’s agenda to expand its dominance over Bahrain.

Members of the [Persian] Gulf Cooperation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, are expected to meet and discuss closer union among the six countries on May 14.

The member states claim the purpose of the unity is to counter regional threats.

In December 2011, Saudi King Abdullah called on the council members to move “beyond the stage of cooperation and into the stage of unity in a single entity.”

Reports say Saudi Arabia will merge initially with Bahrain in order for the six-member Arab council to reach unity.

This comes while some members of the council have expressed concern about Saudi Arabia’s possible dominance over the other five countries if the council becomes unified.

A Qatari official, whose name was not mentioned in the news reports, said on Friday that Doha “sees this all as Saudi Arabia’s way of undermining the [Persian] Gulf States bilateral relations and forcing its own agenda.”

Meanwhile, many commentators say it is unlikely that such unification will occur within the [Persian] Gulf Cooperation Council.

The following is the transcript of Press TV’s interview with Kevin Barrett, author and Islamic studies expert, about the issue:

Press TV: The Bahraini information minister has said the union could start with two or three members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council. On the other hand, we are already seeing rejections being voiced by some of those member states. Is this primarily about a Bahrain-Saudi Arabia union and a move by Saudi Arabia to get the support of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council on this?

Kevin Barrett: Yes, I think the Saudis are trying to keep the lid on protests in the region and they are trying to strengthen their position in Bahrain which they already invaded last year.

To call this a move on the European Union model is disingenuous. I think this is more along the lines of Hitler’s Anschluss, when Nazi Germany invaded Austria. The big difference is that the majority of people in Austria supported that. Whereas today, the vast majority of people in Bahrain will be horrified to be occupied by and digested into Wahhabi Saudi Arabia.

Normally, I think it would be a good thing for countries in the Islamic world to join together according to a sort of European Union model, perhaps have a united currency -- gold Dinar being the obvious currency standard -- but in this case we have seen the most regressive countries, the sheikhdoms of the Persian Gulf that have been repressing their people for many decades up until very recently, half the people in Saudi Arabia were still illiterate and impoverished...There has been some improvement, but this is not a regime that has the welfare of it own people in mind. This is a regime that is playing ball with the world’s biggest imperialist financial powers to privilege the region of its oil wealth and to put that money into the petro-dollar.

Press TV: We were speaking to a Bahraini human rights campaigner earlier and he said it is not only Saudi Arabia. Even Saudi Arabia, because of the crisis that it is facing inside the country itself, it is on shaky grounds itself and these are orders that Saudi Arabia is getting from the United States and these cannot happen without the US consent. What is your view on that?

Kevin Barrett: I am sure that is correct. The Saudi leadership has been with the US leadership since [former US president] Franklin Roosevelt signed a pact with the king of Saudi Arabia in 1945 and another key moment in this very close relationships was in 1970 when the US and Saudis arranged to take the US dollar off the gold standard and inaugurate the petro-dollar backed by Saudi oil sales.

Since then, revenue from the Saudi oil has been propping up the dominance of the petro-dollars in  world trade. So, these two countries are very closely connected and from a human rights perspective, it is a shame. The United States is always talking about democracy and human rights and yet Saudi Arabia is one of the worst countries on earth for that. It is a terrible example for the Muslim world and yet we have the Americans propping up this cruel dictatorship and encouraging it to invade neighboring Bahrain, where they have an Arab Spring mass movement happening.

The American people, I think if they knew what was going on there, I hope would stand up and stop supporting this kind of oppression. The US needs to allow the countries of the Persian Gulf and the rest of the world a lot more independence. The US has been running an empire since the World War II and it is time for the US to let go of this empire and start dealing with the people of the other countries in the world fairly and once we do that the Arab Spring will reach to the Persian Gulf.

Press TV: The US has for decades been urging the Persian Gulf Arab states to agree to set up, for instance, a shared missile shield and this is seen as a step towards a joint arms pact that would require basing radar system in one country missiles in another country. But does the fact that this has not happened up until now show that there is strong end to the Arab feud do you think and is this latest proposal going to intensify that feuding between these states?

Kevin Barrett: I think the question pretty well answered itself correctly. The US is pushing for this kind of so-called cooperation, meaning Saudi dominance, because basically these countries have not been very effective at setting up powerful modern societies. So, basically they have been colonial outposts of the US empire which has dominated these countries, but they continue to squabble. I would not be surprised if this proposal does not go very far.

Certainly, the people of Bahrain are not likely to welcome it and I think they will keep their Arab Spring protest going and I assume that the world will not look happily upon Saudi Arabia invading a neighbouring country and incorporating it to its own country.

This is what [former Iraqi dictator] Saddam Hossein tried to do it to Kuwait and the world was not terribly happy about it. I think a similar lack of success will probably be met here as well.