If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Shameless chutzpah: Could it work for Muslims too?

As an American Muslim, I am a great admirer of the Jewish people, especially American Jews. I think we Muslims can learn a lot from the way Jews have made their presence felt in American society.
For example, I marvel at the chutzpah of the Beth Shalom Temple in Corona, California, which recently tried to shake down Mel Gibson:

“Our proposal to you, Mr. Gibson, is since you have been cited as an Anti-Semitic, and have denied those allegations, what better way to prove to all your fans and the nay Sayers — than to endorse and help raise funds for our cause — SOS, Save Our Synagogue…Mr. Gibson, we offer you to be a Mensch and make a sizable contribution to our cause.”

I imagine the folks at Beth Shalom Temple need the money for their PR campaign against anti-Semitism. They plan to run ads insisting that contrary to the pernicious stereotypes in films like Mel Brooks' The Producers, Jews are NOT shameless, pushy, money-grubbing opportunists.

If they can pry a few more million dollars loose from Gibson, the next step will be to hire America's latest Jewish overnight sensation, Andrew "assassinate Obama for Israel' Adler, to host a series of ads proving that American Jews do NOT harbor dual loyalties.  Adler is the ultimate example of an American who clearly harbors loyalty to only one country. By flooding prime-time TV with images of Adler calling on Israel to assassinate Obama, the BS Temple PR pros should be able to finish off that "dual loyalties" canard once and for all.



And so...if shameless chutzpah pays off for Jews, why not for Muslims too? How about:

Dear Bill Maher, 

Our proposal to you, since you have been cited as an Islamophobe, is to send us a million dollars and publicly apologize for calling Muslims a bunch of violent extremists. If you don't do this, we'll come and blow you up. 

Sincerely,

Dr. Kevin Barrett

And since just about all of the wealthy and powerful individuals and institutions in America are islamophobic, we should be able to shake them all down.

Then we'll take the billions we've raised, and buy up the media. We'll make sure that Muslims get the majority of key posts, and that a pro-Muslim, anti-Zionist point of view completely dominates the airwaves and headlines.

And we'll use the rest of the money to buy up Congress and the presidency.

And then if anybody even MENTIONS the fact that Muslims have bought up the media and staffed it with a wildly disproportionate number of Muslims and anti-Zionists...and that anti-Zionist Muslims have bought the federal government via bribery...we'll just silence them by calling them Islamophobes.

Now THAT would be al-chutzpah al-akbar.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Islam, family values, and the decline of Western Civilization

 
Ominous music plays as images appear on the screen: Muslim terrorists shoot Christians in the head, car bombs explode, executed children lie covered by sheets and a doctored photograph shows an Islamic flag flying over the White House.

“This is the true agenda of much of Islam in America,” a narrator intones. “A strategy to infiltrate and dominate America. ... This is the war you don’t know about.”
-NY Times report on anti-Muslim hate film used in NYPD training

Let's try a little historical IQ test. Read these items and connect-the-dots.

* Zionist-made hate-Islam films are shown to American cops and soldiers as part of their training.


* Many Americans, asked what country the US should invade next, say "Iran" - but when asked to find it on the map, they point to places like Australia.


* In California, schools are required to "teach students about the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans."


* According to news reports, women kill their children so they can go out partying.


*"Abortion is here to stay; even Republicans know that banning it would be political poison."

Actually, I lied. This isn't an IQ test - it's a Rorsach test. You're welcome to interpret this data any way you want.

Here's how I interpret it: The family unit, the basis of civilization, is falling apart in the West. The collapse of the family, education, public and private morality, aesthetic taste, literature and the arts, religion, grand narratives in general, the birth rate, marriage rate, etc. is symptomatic of steep cultural decline. The West is heading for the New Dark Ages, and there probably isn't much anybody can do about it.*

Neoconservatives, cognizant of imperial collapse, panicked because Israel is the most vulnerable outpost of Western empire, are trying to save Israel, which in their view is synonymous with Western civilization, by uniting the West in hatred of Islam. To succeed in this, they have to tell gigantic lies 24/7/365.

Their central big lie: "Islam is a military threat to the West."

Reality: The Islamic world is militarily feeble. While it is just barely possible that the combined military power of the world's 1.5 billion Muslims might pose a serious threat to the tiny and dubiously legitimate "nation" of Israel - actually a settler colony stolen from the Muslims - there is no "Islamic military threat" to the USA, Europe, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand. The Mossad has had to bomb the World Trade Center twice, and launch false-flag attacks all over the globe, to create the appearance of such a threat.

Islam is being targeted not because it is a problem, but because it offers a solution. 

There is only one major bloc of seriously religious people left on earth: Practicing Muslims. These are people who stop whatever they are doing (including sleep) at dawn, noon, mid-afternoon, dusk, and nightfall to practice salaat - a quasi-yogic ritual enactment of absolute submission to God. These are people who abstain from all food and drink, including water, throughout the daylight hours for a full month every year. These are people who do not touch alcohol - or any other drugs except maybe coffee or tea. These are people who abstain from sex outside of marriage.

Like Christians 500 years ago, practicing Muslims are as interested in the next life as in this one. (Unlike some extremist medieval Christians, they do not go so far as to denigrate this life or claim that it means nothing while the next life means everything; in this, as in all things, Islam offers balance.)

Among practicing Muslims, rates of crime, suicide, alcoholism, drug addiction, venereal disease, abortion, divorce, etc. are off-the-charts low. (Google "Islam most civilized Javed Jamil" for the data.)

The single strongest indicator of non-recidivism for prisoners is conversion to Islam.

The number of seriously practicing Muslims on earth is in the many hundreds of millions. Due to their relative success in forming and maintaining strong families, they are demographically outpacing less-religious folk, especially Westerners.

And Islam is a straightforward, sensible religion that "works." Anybody who practices it sincerely gets the benefits - as reflected by the statistics showing that practicing Muslims are doing off-the-charts well in all important social indicators. (These, of course, are just material indicators of spiritual well-being, i.e. inner peace.)

That's why Islam is the fastest growing religion in America, and in the world.

And THAT is the real "Islamic threat."

* * *

* Required reading on the decline of Western civilization includes Spengler, Gibbon, Morris Berman, Neil Postman, Eric Larsen, Pat Buchanan, Joseph Tainter, Don Delillo...that should keep you busy for awhile. Note that Berman is brilliant but gets 9/11 wrong. (The 9/11 inside job, and its acceptance by the masses and alleged intelligentsia despite all the elephant-in-the-living-room evidence, is an even stronger symptom of cultural decline than all of other evidence that Americans can't tell their collective ass from a hole in the ground put together.)

Friday, January 20, 2012

Dear Editor of The Jewish Times: Please re-think your call to assassinate Obama

Sent to aadler@jewishtimes.com

Dear Andrew Adler,

As the editor of a mainstream Jewish publication, you have an awful lot of chutzpah to call for the assassination of the President of the United States by the Mossad. I hope this email reaches you before the Secret Service does! If by some miracle you remain free on your own recognizance, or can afford the bail, I would love to discuss the pros and cons of a Mossad assassination of Obama on my radio show with you. I have openings next Wednesday and Friday, 4 to 5 pm Eastern.

You ask, "what would you do" if you were the Prime Minister of Israel, facing the fact that a war with Hezbullah and Hamas would be much nastier for Israel in 2017 than in 2012. Your answer is that Netanyahu's only choice is to start a war now - with Iran as well as Hezbullah and Hamas. And the only way to start that war is to kill President Obama, who stands in its way.

When an apparently logical line of reasoning leads to an illogical or insane conclusion, it is time to re-think your logic. (I'm no Obama fan either, but let's face it, publishing calls for his assassination is stupid and immoral as well as illegal! And war with Iran would be a disaster!)

So start re-thinking. Israel has been operating according to your kind of logic since 1948. And that logic is leading to its destruction.

In 1948, it seemed logical to slaughter whole villages full of men, women and children, in order to exterminate part of the Palestinian population and force most of the survivors into exile. This was the only logical way to get a Jewish majority for the new state. That logic, however, has led to a situation in which billions of people around the world hate Israel, and a significant fraction of those are committed to its destruction.

In 1963, "worst-case" logic dictated that Israel obtain nuclear weapons. To that end, it seems likely that the Mossad participated alongside elements of the CIA in the murder of President Kennedy, who was determined to deny Israel nuclear weapons. A growing minority of Americans is joining a much larger number of intellectuals from around the world who are aware of this likelihood; the result is more anger and disgust with Israel. (See Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment.)

In 1967, strategic logic dictated an attempt to create a Greater Israel through a disguised war of aggression. During this war, strategic logic dictated that Israel destroy the USS Liberty and murder its entire crew. Through a minor miracle, that attempted failed, most of the Liberty crew survived, and today, a growing number of Americans loathes Israel in large part due to this incident.

Since the 1967 war of aggression, paranoid/bellicose "logic" has led Israel to refuse to return the territories it stole, despite the consensus of the world community that it must do so. The result is that Israel is a pariah nation, and few around the world would shed a tear at its demise. Ever-growing numbers want a world without Israel. So, in a vicious circle, Israel resorts to ever-more-insane acts of desperation.

Many further examples of your kind of logic have ensued: The Sabra and Shatilla massacres, false-flag terror attacks around the world, cross-border assassinations, invasions of Lebanon, Operation Cast Lead, and so on. Each time Israel acts this way, people like you cite the logical strategic necessity for such actions; while a much larger number of people incur more and more hatred and disgust for Israel and Zionism.

Personally, I have always disliked Israel, because I have always disliked injustice. But until recent years, this was not a high-priority issue for me. Now, after watching one Zionist outrage after another - the most important being the neocon-Zionist coup d'etat on 9/11/2001 and the ensuing war on Islam for Israel - I am committed to putting an end to Zionism.

And I'm far from the only one. I am told by people in a position to know that disgust with Israel is at an all-time high at the upper levels of the US military command. If Netanyahu takes your advice and murders Obama, you just might get to see Israel reduced to smoking radioactive rubble, and American Zionists - even those who had not overtly called for the assassination of the President - made to pay a heavy price. (I shudder to imagine what might happen to you personally, given your openly-published call for Obama's assassination.)

As you admit in your article, Israel has painted itself into a corner, a Kobayashi Maru situation, a "no-win scenario or facing a solution that involves redefining the problem." Maybe the best way to redefine the problem would be to forget about plans for mass-murdering Palestinians, Lebanese, and Iranians, forget about plans for assassinating the President of the United States, forget about plans for more big false-flag attacks, and go back to square one. Admit Israel's responsibility for the dead-end situation it is in. Admit who is really the aggressor, and who is the victim. And then, wholeheartedly seek to make amends, as Jews are supposed to do every Yom Kippur.

Imagine if Netanyahu gave a Yom Kippur speech along these lines: "We're sorry. You Palestinians are right. We are the aggressors, and we have perpetrated a grave injustice - not just in 1967, but in 1948 and before that. Your demands for right of return plus compensation, along with a return to the 1967 borders, are almost pathetically minimal and reasonable. Apartheid and endless war doesn't have a future. We want to work with you to build a new Palestine-Israel and a new Middle East. Come home - in numbers that we'll work out based on what's practical. We're willing to endure a temporary lowering of the standard of living for Israeli Jews and Russian-immigrant fake Jews in order to help you return to the country we stole so unjustly, and make it a country for you as well as for us."

After a certain number of Israeli outrages, it will be too late for this kind of offer. It may even be too late now. But it's worth a try, since the current road is such an obvious dead-end.

If you disagree, you're welcome to join me on my radio show and explain why. But please don't use my show as a platform to call for the assassination of the President.

Best,

Kevin Barrett

Dear Andrew Adler,

As the editor of a mainstream Jewish publication, you have an awful lot of chutzpah to call for the assassination of the President of the United States by the Mossad. I hope this email reaches you before the Secret Service does! If by some miracle you remain free on your own recognizance, or can afford the bail, I would love to discuss the pros and cons of a Mossad assassination of Obama on my radio show with you. I have openings next Wednesday and Friday, 4 to 5 pm Eastern.

You ask, "what would you do" if you were the Prime Minister of Israel, facing the fact that a war with Hezbullah and Hamas would be much nastier for Israel in 2017 than in 2012. Your answer is that Netanyahu's only choice is to start a war now - with Iran as well as Hezbullah and Hamas. And the only way to start that war is to kill President Obama, who stands in its way.

When an apparently logical line of reasoning leads to an illogical or insane conclusion, it is time to re-think your logic. (I'm no Obama fan either, but let's face it, publishing calls for his assassination is stupid and immoral as well as illegal! And war with Iran would be a disaster!)

So start re-thinking. Israel has been operating according to your kind of logic since 1948. And that logic is leading to its destruction.

In 1948, it seemed logical to slaughter whole villages full of men, women and children, in order to exterminate part of the Palestinian population and force most of the survivors into exile. This was the only logical way to get a Jewish majority for the new state. That logic, however, has led to a situation in which billions of people around the world hate Israel, and a significant fraction of those are committed to its destruction.

In 1963, "worst-case" logic dictated that Israel obtain nuclear weapons. To that end, it seems likely that the Mossad participated alongside elements of the CIA in the murder of President Kennedy, who was determined to deny Israel nuclear weapons. A growing minority of Americans is joining a much larger number of intellectuals from around the world who are aware of this likelihood; the result is more anger and disgust with Israel. (See Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment.)

In 1967, strategic logic dictated an attempt to create a Greater Israel through a disguised war of aggression. During this war, strategic logic dictated that Israel destroy the USS Liberty and murder its entire crew. Through a minor miracle, that attempted failed, most of the Liberty crew survived, and today, a growing number of Americans loathes Israel in large part due to this incident.

Since the 1967 war of aggression, paranoid/bellicose "logic" has led Israel to refuse to return the territories it stole, despite the consensus of the world community that it must do so. The result is that Israel is a pariah nation, and few around the world would shed a tear at its demise. Ever-growing numbers want a world without Israel. So, in a vicious circle, Israel resorts to ever-more-insane acts of desperation.

Many further examples of your kind of logic have ensued: The Sabra and Shatilla massacres, false-flag terror attacks around the world, cross-border assassinations, invasions of Lebanon, Operation Cast Lead, and so on. Each time Israel acts this way, people like you cite the logical strategic necessity for such actions; while a much larger number of people incur more and more hatred and disgust for Israel and Zionism.

Personally, I have always disliked Israel, because I have always disliked injustice. But until recent years, this was not a high-priority issue for me. Now, after watching one Zionist outrage after another - the most important being the neocon-Zionist coup d'etat on 9/11/2001 and the ensuing war on Islam for Israel - I am committed to putting an end to Zionism.

And I'm far from the only one. I am told by people in a position to know that disgust with Israel is at an all-time high at the upper levels of the US military command. If Netanyahu takes your advice and murders Obama, you just might get to see Israel reduced to smoking radioactive rubble, and American Zionists - even those who had not overtly called for the assassination of the President - made to pay a heavy price. (I shudder to imagine what might happen to you personally, given your openly-published call for Obama's assassination.)

As you admit in your article, Israel has painted itself into a corner, a Kobayashi Maru situation, a "no-win scenario or facing a solution that involves redefining the problem." Maybe the best way to redefine the problem would be to forget about plans for mass-murdering Palestinians, Lebanese, and Iranians, forget about plans for assassinating the President of the United States, forget about plans for more big false-flag attacks, and go back to square one. Admit Israel's responsibility for the dead-end situation it is in. Admit who is really the aggressor, and who is the victim. And then, wholeheartedly seek to make amends, as Jews are supposed to do every Yom Kippur.

Imagine if Netanyahu gave a Yom Kippur speech along these lines: "We're sorry. You Palestinians are right. We are the aggressors, and we have perpetrated a grave injustice - not just in 1967, but in 1948 and before that. Your demands for right of return plus compensation, along with a return to the 1967 borders, are almost pathetically minimal and reasonable. Apartheid and endless war doesn't have a future. We want to work with you to build a new Palestine-Israel and a new Middle East. Come home - in numbers that we'll work out based on what's practical. We're willing to endure a temporary lowering of the standard of living for Israeli Jews and Russian-immigrant fake Jews in order to help you return to the country we stole so unjustly, and make it a country for you as well as for us."

After a certain number of Israeli outrages, it will be too late for this kind of offer. It may even be too late now. But it's worth a try, since the current road is such an obvious dead-end.

If you disagree, you're welcome to join me on my radio show and explain why. But please don't use my show as a platform to call for the assassination of the President.

Best,

Kevin Barrett

PS You might also enjoy my article on "Zionist shots across Obama's bow"

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Newt for Caliph!



Dear Newt Gingrich,

I am writing to volunteer to step in as your new chief campaign adviser, now that your former staff, followers, and prospective voters have deserted you in disgust. I believe I can devise a strategy that will not only get you elected President, despite your recently-revealed foibles, but perhaps even lead to a far more powerful position.

As a Muslim free-speech fanatic, I may seem an unlikely candidate for chief Gingrich advisor. After all, you are on record calling for a "long war" against Islam that will require the US to abrogate its freedom of speech and religious liberty: “This is a serious long-term war, and it will inevitably lead us to want to know what is said in every suspect place in the country...We will adopt rules of engagement that use every technology we can find, to break up their capacity to use the Internet, to break up their capacity to use free speech."

Newt, the time has come for you to do your last, best political flip-flop: Stop being a Constitution-shredding Islamophobe, and recognize that there's a freedom-loving Muslim inside you that's just waiting to come out.

Not long ago, you told your wife: "You need to share me."  That seems odd, since you're a fanatic proponent of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as "one man and one woman."

Newt, if you want a "one man and two women" marriage, it's doable. As a Muslim, you could conceivably marry up to four wives at once.

The only catch is that you'll have to stop being such a greedy, narcissistic, corrupt, selfish, megalomaniacal asshole.

In Islam, you can't marry more than one wife unless you are sure you can treat each of them equally well. That's a tough order - especially since the Qur'an suggests that men CAN'T treat their wives equally well!

So after you come to Islam, you're going to have to do some serious soul-searching. You're going to have to give up all of those egocentric traits that make you the most loathsome public figure in America - which is saying a lot. You're going to have to stop being such a goddamn hypocrite (the Qur'an reviles hypocrites). You're going to have to stop serving the cause of injustice, and instead work for justice. You're going to have to dedicate your life to truth, and to the service of Allah through good works. And you're going to have to become a loyal and loving caretaker to your wife - or wives, if you really think you (and the women concerned) want that.  (Most Muslims don't; the vast majority of us are in monogamous marriages - as was the Prophet Muhammad, SAAS, for most of his adult life.)

Newt, once you've come to Islam, and become a good, pious submitter-to-Allah, just think about the example you'll set for your fellow Americans! The sleaziest douchebag in the country will have suddenly become a good, God-conscious worker-of-justice and persister-in-truth. People will be astounded; it will seem a miracle. Very quickly, the whole country will follow you to Islam.

Then America will elect you President.

And the Islamic world will elect you Caliph.

And you will have finally realized your ambition: "I have an enormous personal ambition.I want to shift the entire planet. And I'm doing it...Oh, this is just the beginning of a 20-or-30-year movement. I'll get credit for it..."

The good news is that you will have shifted the planet towards good, rather than evil. The bad news is that once you've submitted to Allah, you will no longer be a megalomaniacal lunatic, so being Caliph will be a public service and a burden, rather than an ego-trip.

Sounds like a plan? Just contact me here at kbarrett(at)merr(dot)com and I'll arrange for you to take shahada and begin life as a new Muslim.

Your future brother in Islam and Grand Wazir (insha'allah)

Dr. Kevin Barrett

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Mitt Romney: Alien or psychopath?

When history professor David Jacobs told me last week that the weight of the evidence suggests that human-alien hybrids are among us, my first thought was: That explains Mitt Romney.

Like serial killer Ted Bundy, the all-time quintessential Republican, Mitt Romney is smooth, suave, handsome - like he was cast in plastic, rather than nurtured in a human uterus. There's something inhuman in his voice and facial expressions and the way he moves and handles himself. He reminds me of the androids in Disney World's Hall of Presidents.

If I were asked to distinguish between Romney and a walking, talking android simulacrum of Romney, I would pick the one with more gravitas. That would definitely be the android.

Is Romney a plastic shell, operated in real time by a gray alien equivalent of Karl Rove? Possibly. But it seems far more likely that he is, like Bundy, an inhuman human: one of the 2% of males who are clinical psychopaths.

The theory that Romney (like so many political leaders) is a psychopath got a boost recently from reports of him putting his dog in a cage on his car roof for a 12-hour family trip:

During the trip, the Boston Globe reported, Romney’s oldest son, Tagg, looked around through the rear window and yelled, “Dad — gross!” A brown liquid was dripping down the back window — diarrhea from an animal that just might have been caused by the stress of being inside a cage for 12 hours on top of a car going 60 mph.

And what did Romney do, even after knowing of the dog's diarrhea? Did he realize that perhaps Seamus should be shown some mercy, cleaned up and allowed in the car, to sleep on someone’s lap?

No.

Here’s how the Globe described what Romney then did:

“As the rest of the boys joined in the howls of disgust, Romney coolly pulled off the highway and into a service station. There he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car, then hopped back onto the highway. It was a tiny preview of a trait he would grow famous for in business: emotion-free crisis management.”

Emotion-free crisis management: the kind of "right stuff" that allowed Republican archetype Ted Bundy to wash the gore off himself after his serial rape-murders and head right on back to Republican headquarters as if nothing had happened.

It's true that a lot of American business leaders exhibit that kind of "emotion-free crisis management." Robert Hare, the world's leading expert on psychopaths, knows them well. He calls them "Snakes in Suits."

According to psychopathy expert Martha Stout, psychopaths often give themselves away by mistreating their pets. Not necessarily in an aggressive or outlandish fashion; they just fail to exhibit the kind of care that someone with a heart would take for granted. Romney's treatment of his dog would appear to be a classic example.

But what really seals the deal, branding Romney as an almost certain psychopath, is Romney's transparent lack of remorse for the way he treated his dog, his complete lack of empathy for another creature's suffering, his inability to understand that he did anything wrong, and his invention of ridiculous lies in an attempt to cover his tracks. 

If today Romney, looking back, were to say, “You know, in retrospect, that was a cruel thing to do to our dog — I was young, it was a long time ago, I am sorry” — if he said that today, I’d forgive him.

But instead — Romney being Romney — he defaults into saying something utterly implausible. He recently told Fox's dog-loving Chris Wallace that Seamus actually loved it up there!

He then told Wallace that the dog was in an "air-tight container," not mentioning the diarrhea.


Psychopaths have a hard time understanding why anyone would object to them torturing a dog - or a human being. So when they're called on it, they offer absurd excuses about how the victim "didn't really mind the torture" or the rape victim "really loved it."  Or they invent even more absurd lies, like "the dog was in an air-tight container for twelve hours." An airtight container?! How could the dog breathe? And how did that diarrhea get out of an airtight container to trickle down the rear windshield?!

Lanny Davis, author of the Fox News article I have quoted from at length, ponders Mitt Romney's behavior and concludes that something is not quite right with Romney - that someone with such lack of compassion for his own dog, and the propensity to lie like he breathes, is bad news. What he doesn't seem to realize is that he has just made a very good case that Romney - like so many other leaders - would, if tested, almost certainly score very high on the psychopathy scale.

* * *
For an introduction to the topic of psychopaths in power, check out my article Twilight of the Psychopaths.

Friday, January 13, 2012

2012 is here, moral pole shift underway

"The Earth's magnetic field, our primary defense against harmful solar radiation, has begun to dwindle, with California-sized cracks opening up randomly. A pole shift, in which such protection falls nearly to zero as the North and South magnetic poles reverse position, may well be under way."  - Lawrence E. Joseph, Apocalypse 2012: An Investigation into Civilization's End.


I'm not an end-of-the-worlder.  I'm not a gloom-and-doomer.

But after a week of US Marines urinating on corpses, Republican candidates cheering the murders of Iranian scientists, and US officials all but admitting that the real reason for hostilities with Iran is that Iran is one of the last countries on earth with a non-Rothschild central bank...in other words, that Americans are being frog-marched into World War III by Rothschild satanists in order to create a Jerusalem-based global bankster dictatorship...well, I'm starting to believe in this pole-shift thing.

Americans have obviously lost their moral compass. The poles of morality - good and evil - are switching places.

Americans are taking evil as their good.  And the good - for example, people in Afghanistan and Iran defending their country and their religion from satanic foreign invasion - appears to them as evil.

Here is a picture of a good man, a good citizen, and a good father. His name was Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan. His job involved building nuclear power plants so that his country will survive when its oil runs out - probably in no more than a decade or two.

He was blown to bits by a psychotic killer from a psychotic killer state. The psychotic killer state says Mostafa's crime was working on a technology that might one day enable Mostafa's country to build nuclear weapons - which the psychotic killer state already possesses in abundance.

You don't need much of a moral compass to see who is good and innocent and honest, and who is evil and hypocritical and guilty, in this situation. Yet Americans allow their politicians to openly call for, and gloat over, the murder of good by evil.

As the moral pole shift continues to build in intensity, expect to see Republican presidential candidates knocking each other over as they scramble to be the first to kiss the sulphorous arse of Satan. Expect to see them demanding that the Nuremburg laws of war be re-written so that defending ones country from invasion is the supreme war crime, while aggression is a universal right. Expect to see them running ads vaunting their status as clients of child prostitution services, each claiming to best their fellow candidates in pederasty. Expect to see them calling press conferences at which they wallow naked in swimming pools full of raw sewage and bribe money. Expect to see them expressing their support for the US military's legalization of bestiality by buggering donkeys in front of cheering platoons of flag-waving servicemen. Expect to see them not just calling for torture, but actually demonstrating their love of torture on live TV by gleefully extracting the fingernails of randomly selected victims. Expect them to demonstrate how "enemy combatants" should be extra-judicially executed, by kidnapping their rivals' staffers and personally snuffing them in front of cheering, banner-waving throngs. Expect to see their support for indefinite military detention expand into support for death camps for Democrats, Independents, and Ron Paul voters. Expect to see them not only defending troops who urinate on fallen martyrs, but demanding that the troops be required to defecate on them as well - then wipe with the flag, the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence. Expect to see them openly calling for World War III, and promising that, if elected, they will push the button faster and harder than their rivals.

America's moral pole shift would beggar the imagination of St. John the Revelator.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Big media's attempt to verbally assassinate Ron Paul is indefensible

Henry Blodget of Business Insider claims he "told the truth about Ron Paul" when he said the media is right to ignore or disparage Dr. Paul, because Dr. Paul's ideas are non-mainstream, which makes the good Doctor unelectable.  He is running a selection of emails he got in response. Unfortunately none of them succeeds in showing how ridiculous Blodget's position actually is. So here goes:
 
Dear Henry Blodget,

You argue that the media has every right to ignore and/or disparage Ron Paul, because Paul's positions are "non-mainstream" which makes him unelectable. 

Your central premise is not just faulty, but absurd. Is it really the media's business to determine what is "mainstream," and to censor or attack anything that is not? What objective evidence determines what is "mainstream"? Public opinion polls? If so, why does the media label "mainstream" the 16% of Americans who believe the government is telling the truth about 9/11, while consigning the 84% who have doubts to the margins? (source) Obviously the media has created - not reported - the perception that 9/11 truth is "fringe" while acceptance of the official story of 9/11 is "mainstream."

The same is even more true of Ron Paul's foreign policy. Dr. Paul's thesis is that the US should defend its borders, not police the world. This has been the mainstream position of the vast majority of Americans since the founding of the Republic. A tiny activist minority has labeled the majority opinion "isolationist," and worked hard to create the perception that the minority of activists (or, to put it less kindly, warmongers) represent mainstream opinion, while the vast majority who are "isolationists" are somehow on the fringe. This mendacious project recalls the way the Bolsheviks, when they were a fringe minority, usurped the term for "majority party." The difference is that the Bolsheviks really did become the majority party, whereas the war party in the US has always been a tiny minority that can only get its way by telling lies to the majority. (Such lies include Pearl Harbor - google "eight-point plan" - as well as Operation Northwoods, the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kuwait baby incubator hoax, 9/11, and so on.)*

Given the above, I am sure you will admit that the notion of what is "mainstream" has little to do with majority opinion. What, then, are the relevant criteria? I challenge you to produce a method, based on marshaling objective evidence, that can separate "mainstream" from "fringe" positions. Remember, there are literally thousands of issues out there; and the way each issue is framed, as well as the relative importance of each issue, is a subjective matter that varies wildly from person to person.

If you cannot produce an objective, fact-based method to determine what is "mainstream" - and I am certain that you cannot - perhaps you will admit that the media's job is to report honestly, with fairness and balance. Specifically, in covering the election process, big media should treat all candidates equally. If candidate W is getting X percentage of votes, winning Y number of delegates, raising Z amounts of money, competing in Q number of states, etc., that candidate should be taken equally seriously as a contender based on these tangible criteria. To the extent that the candidates' ideas are considered - a very small extent in current practice - they ought to be considered fair-mindedly, carefully and in scrupulous detail.

If the media were reporting responsibly, Paul and Romney would nearly be in a dead heat; and Paul would wear the "over-achieving underdog" mantle and be in a commanding position to win the nomination. After all, Paul won more Iowa delegates than Romney, is ahead of everybody but Romney in fund-raising, delegates, and votes, and most importantly has essentially taken over the Republican Party at the grassroots level across the nation. Finally, Dr. Paul is the only candidate with ideas that really are ideas, whether or not one agrees with them. (I personally agree with his foreign policy, but not his domestic policy.) The other candidates, by contrast, are dishing out pablum without any real substance.

The media's attempt to destroy Dr. Paul's candidacy, allegedly because it has some magical ability to determine what is "mainstream," is so absurd that it raises the question: What is the real reason behind the smokescreen? I submit that the answer is obvious: The media is essentially owned and run by three overlapping special-interest groups: The Zionists, the military-industrial complex, and the big bankers who profit from massive military-spending-induced deficits.  Each of these three groups would see its pet project, and its power, collapse if Paul's utterly mainstream foreign policy were ever implemented. That is why the media is trying to verbally assassinate Dr. Paul, while lying about its reasons for doing so.

Please consider the possibility that you have been thoughtlessly repeating a lie.

And if you disagree, please explain, with a reasonable degree of specificity, what objective criteria lie behind the "mainstream" shibboleth.

Best

Dr. Kevin Barrett


* If you somehow believe that there is a real "extremist Muslim terror threat" out there, please provide your snailmail address and I will send you a free copy of my book Questioning the War on Terror, which proves the contrary.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

A paranoid little ditty in honor of David Jacobs

Later today, I will be interviewing Temple University history professor David Jacobs, whose research has convinced him that large numbers of humans are being victimized by a vast breeding experiment overseen by an alien race known as "The Grays." (Listen live, 4 to 5 Central, on www.AmericanFreedomRadio.com )

I find this notion simultaneously terrifying and hilarious. (Like David Icke's notion that the Queen of England is a bloodsucking lizard from outer space.) A cursory review of Dr. Jacobs' work, and conversations with a couple of paranoid friends, inspired me to write yet another song, hot on the heels of the Cass Sunstein parody.  Et voila:

Ucking Fay With Oo-yay

They're big bloodsucking lizards
Crawled down from outer space
All the way from Orion
To put you in your place

They're psychopathic monsters
Inbred for generations
And now they're targeting your ass
With covert operations

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

They've bought up all the newspapers
And television too
Their robot insects carry cameras
And they're pointing them at you

They spread engineered diseases
And pour chemtrails in the skies
They're the ones who print the money
They're the ones who spread the lies

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

They're working closely with the grays
On alien abductions
They'll mate you with gray goo-goo girls
Who stage snake-charm seductions

They give the New World Orders
And you'd better just obey
Because refusing to believe
Won't make it go away

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

Their psychotronic weapons
Will put you in their mood
When the anal probe is over
You'll know damn well you've been screwed

Took your money and your freedom
Now they want your heart and mind
Stole your reproductive organs
With their genome you're entwined

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

They're Rothschild reptile saucer men
From Area 51
Hitching rides on souped-up saucers
Won't be your idea of fun

They'll strap you to a gurney
And pinch poke squeeze and jab
Stealing reproductive juices
To breed hybrids in their lab

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

Now their hybrids walk among us
Stealthily, still undetected
Their presence and their purpose
By the masses unsuspected

They've seized key nodes of power
Using trickery and force
I think it's safe to say
The human race has run its course

Ch:
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

There's just one way to stop them
(I heard it from an old Jew)
The thing is, here's the catch:
They'd have to kill you if I told you

So try to freeze them on an ice rink
Or play Slim Whitman tunes
You just might find the secret weapon -
But you'd better find it soon!

They're ucking fay with oo-yay
They're ucking fay with oo
They're ucking fay with oo-yay
That's just what those bucking fastards do

Monday, January 9, 2012

PROPAGANDA SCHEMING by Mama Cass Sunstein



Propaganda Scheming by "Mama Cass" Sunstein 

All the lies are going down
Zion's sky is gray
9/11 truth
Just might win the day
I'm dreaming up a scheme
To make those truthers pay
Propaganda scheming
There's got to be a way!

I stopped into a White House
I passed along the way
Walked up to the President
And I began to say
"Those conspiracy theories
Are ruining my day
We need some propaganda scheming
To make them go away!"

Then I told the President
Our nation's gone astray
And I got down on my knees
And I began to pray
"Oh Lord, send us a law
To make those truthers pay
A tax on their conspiracy theories
And make them go away!

(Or send them off to jail,
Just make them go away!)

"The government should disable
Those who would purvey
Conspiracy theories
And infiltrate their brains (INFILTRATE THEIR BRAINS!)
Cognitive infiltration
Is the only way
For our propaganda scheming
To make them go away!"

The President looked at me
And he began to say
"What the hell are you talking about Sunstein
Are you feeling okay?"
So I fled the White House
And called up Jonathan Kay
And we did our propaganda scheming
For the rest of the day (and week and month and year) (and decade and century and millennium)







Alan Hart: "The Zionization of American politics and how it could be terminated"

This just in today from former lead BBC Mideast correspondent Alan Hart, who will join me on the radio today, Monday 1/9/12, 3 to 4 pm Central. Listen live at http://www.AmericanFreedomRadio.com.
-KB

The Zionization of American politics and how it could be terminated
By Alan Hart
     The first headline I thought of for this article was The Zionization of American democracy and how it could be terminated, but then I said to myself: “Don’t be silly, Alan, there’s no democracy in the ‘Land of the Free.’” 
     Leaving aside the fact that any American can now be arrested and detained without due process, there’s no mystery about why.
     There’s much more to democracy than voting every few years for the lesser of two or three evils or in America’s case naked political whores (with the exception among the would-be Republican presidents of Ron Paul).
     A truth is that for democracy to exist, the voters have to be informed enough about critical issues in order to participate in, or at least follow, debate about policy options and choices and call and hold their politicians to account, between elections if necessary. On that basis I know of no country in the world where democracy exists.
     In the so-called democratic or what used to be called the “Free World” we have the framework for democracy but not the substance. When I joined ITN as a very young reporter very many years ago, its great editor-in-chief, Geoffrey Cox, gave me the mission statement in one short sentence. “Our job is to help keep democracy alive.” Today I charge the mainstream media with betraying democracy. So I say thanks for the internet, warts and all. (The jury is still out on how far it will be allowed to propel Arab demands for democracy but it might assist Russians to prevent a return to Stalinism under Mr Putin and his state Mafia).
     A truth about America is that what passes for democracy there is for sale to the highest lobby bidders, not only (I must emphasize) the Zionist lobby in all of its manifestations. 
     On 9 December, quoting the latest findings of Public Campaign, a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to “sweeping campaign reform that aims to dramatically reduce the role of big special interest money in American politics,” International Business Times reported this amazing fact. “By employing a plethora of tax-dodging techniques, 30 multi-million dollar American corporations expended more money lobbying Congress than they paid in federal income taxes between 2008 and 2010, ultimately spending approximately $400,000 every day - including weekends - during that three-year period to lobby lawmakers and influence political elections.”
     But that’s not all. Citizens for Tax Justice, the sister organization to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, reported that 68 of the 265 most consistently profitable Fortune 500 companies did not pay a state corporate income tax during at least one year between 2008 and 2010, while 20 of them paid no taxes at all during that period.
     Apart from the occupant of the White House and those who advise him, probably nobody really knows which are the most influential lobbies in America, but a list of the top ten as compiled by the Business Pundit web site made a lot of sense to me. The following are the ten, not necessarily in order of actual influence wielded.
The Defense Industry” or, as named by President Eisenhower when he warned his fellow Americans to be on their guard and not let it call the policy shots to secure a disproportionate amount of taxpayers’ money, the Military Industrial Complex. It needs conflict and war in order to be able to quench its thirst for taxpayers’ dollars and sustain its position as the biggest creator of jobs and wealth. (According to a recent report in The Economist, the U.S. Department of Defense is the biggest employer in the world with 3.2 million on its payroll, ahead of China’s army with 2.3 million). The heaviest hitters in the defense industry are Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Dynamics.

Big Oil” which is said to spend more on lobbying than any other single special interest group - nearly $150 million in 2010.

The Financial Lobby” which in its various manifestations - banks and other financial institutions - is by far the biggest spender on Capitol Hill, contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to campaigns and political parties. (In return, and as noted by Business Pundit, financial institutions are allowed free reign with other people’s money. A senate committee on the financial crisis of the late 2000’s found that, “The crisis was not a natural disaster, but the result of high risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, the credit rating agencies, and the market itself to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.”)

Big Pharma”. Along with the financial lobbies, the pharmaceutical and health products industries have historically been one of the biggest and most powerful lobbies in Washington. Drug companies enjoy more power and influence in America than with any other government in the world.

The Agribusiness Industry” which represents a diverse collection of special interest groups including large food manufacturers like Kraft and Uniliver, huge agricultural companies like Monsanto, tobacco companies such as Phillip Morris, biofuel producers like UNICA, and logging companies like International Paper and Weyerhauser. These companies spend upwards of $150 million each year, funding campaigns and pushing legislation through Congress or blocking it.

The Tech Lobby” which includes the economic fire power of Google, Apple, Amazon and Microsoft.

The Mining Industry”. This lobby, particularly the coal industry, has had its fingers in American politics for a long time. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it was responsible for some of the most dramatic labor uprisings in history. In the last three years, in the face skepticism on the part of environmental advocacy groups, it spent nearly $100 million on seeking to persuade politicians that “clean coal” really will make a major contribution to averting an energy supply crisis.

The NRA” (National Rifle Association). It has been one of the most consistently influential political lobbies in American politics for the past 30 years. Its power is less in money and more its ability to mobilize its members. It puts major effort into opposing candidates who advocate gun control. (Al Gore, for example, lost the 2000 election in his own home state of Tennessee primarily because of his pro gun-control stance).

The AARP” (American Association of Retired Persons). It is an NGO and special interest group for people aged 50 and over and one of the largest lobbying groups in Washington.

The Pro-Israel Lobby” which is more accurately described as the Zionist Lobby. As my regular readers know, I insist that it’s wrong to call this lobby pro-Israel because to do so implies that it speaks for all Israeli Jews and it does not. Headed by AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) which speaks for not more than about 25% of Jewish Americans, it has been called the NRA of foreign policy lobbies because of its ability to make or break politicians including presidents.

The statement that best sums up for me the consequences of all this financial fire power on America’s political system was the one made by the man I would like to see as America’s next president - Rocky Anderson. Who is he?

On Monday 19 December, at a press conference in Washington D.C., he announced the creation of a new third party, the Justice Party, and his intention to run for the presidency under its banner.

Just turned 60, Rocky Anderson, a former two-term mayor of Utah’s Salt Lake City, has an impressive record of service to what could be called the public good on many fronts. For reasons of space I have to ask readers who want to know more about him to take a look at his Wikipedia entry.

On 11 August last year he denounced the Democratic Party and resigned his membership of it. In his letter to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, he said: “Until the Democratic Party shows some spine and draws a line in the sand - that an end to the tax breaks for the wealthy needs to be part of any debt/budget bill - please take my name off your list... I'm done with the Democratic Party. As I said on Amy Goodman's show a couple years ago, I've put my proud Democrat coffee mug in storage. I think now I'll just throw it in the garbage and have done with it... The Constitution has been eviscerated while Democrats have stood by with nary a whimper. It is a gutless, unprincipled party, bought and paid for by the same interests that buy and pay for the Republican Party.”

I was inspired by Amy Goodman’s interview with Anderson for Open Democracy very shortly after his announcement of the formation of the Justice Party.
     The great thing about television is that it gives viewers the opportunity not only to listen to what speakers are saying but also to study their body language as they are speaking and listening to the questions. In other words, television gives viewers the opportunity to ask and answer an important question - Do I believe this guy or gal? With Tony Blair, for example, my answer was always “No”. And I regret to say it has become “No” when I listen to President Obama and watch his body language. Anderson’s body language told me he is a man I can believe and that makes what he had to say more than important - even though he has no chance of becoming president in 2013. (After that...?)
     Here is what he said in answer to one of Goodman’s questions.
     “We launched the Justice Party because the entire system is so corrupt. It's so diseased. We know that the public interest is not being served by anyone in the system right now, particularly the two dominant parties who have sustained this corrupt system and who are sustained by it... Obama received more money from Wall Street than any presidential candidate ever. And they got a great return on their investment... We need people in public office who are pledged not to just represent the people's interest in the same system, but to change the system and get the corrupting influence of corporate and other concentrated wealth out of our electoral system and out of our system of governance.”
     Common sense says that the only way to end the financial corruption of American politics is by the people, the voters, demanding that it be ended.
     A real clean-up would require legislation giving effect to the proposition that all elections will be funded by only one source - public money raised from taxation, with the revenue ring-fenced so that it could only be used for elections. There are about 100 million voters in America and ten dollars added each year to their tax bill would provide enough money for all election funding. Ten dollars a year is surely a very small price for each voter to pay for something approaching real democracy.
     Given that Congress’s approval rating is closer to 10 percent than 20 percent according to the latest polls, organizing a rolling and rising tide of people power to demand the necessary constitutional amendment or amendments to get the corrupting influence of lobby funding out of the electoral system ought not to be a mission impossible.
     In other words, if enough American voters were aware of how corrupt their political system actually is, and if then they cared enough, they could cause the corruption to be terminated. What a demonstration of real democracy in action that would be!
     In an opinion piece for The Electronic Intifada on 27 December, Ilan Pappe wrote the following.
     “If we had a wish list for 2012 as Palestinians and friends of Palestine, one of the top items ought to be our hope that we can translate the dramatic shift in recent years in world public opinion into political action against Israeli policies on the ground... We know why this has not yet materialized: the political, intellectual and cultural elites of the West cower (crouch or cringe in fear) whenever they even contemplate acting according to their own consciences as well as the wishes of their societies. This last year was particularly illuminating for me in that respect. I encountered that timidity at every station in the many trips I took for the cause I believe in. And these personal experiences were accentuated by the more general examples of how governments and institutions caved in under intimidation from Israel and pro-Zionist Jewish organizations.”
     In America Zionist intimidation which causes the “caving in” manifests itself in two ways. 
One is funding for election campaigns and the threat, actually the promise, not only to deny funding to candidates who won’t commit to toeing Zionism’s line but to fund their opponents.  
     The other is delivery of Zionist lobby organized Jewish votes in close election races. (In a few states that are home to large Jewish populations - New York, California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Florida - the Jewish vote can be decisive).
     Once upon a time, when most Jewish Americans voted for Democratic Party candidates, Republicans running for office did not bother to grovel for Jewish campaign funds and votes. An indicator of how times are changing is that in the current race for the White House, and with the exception of Ron Paul, Republican candidates are grovelling for Jewish campaign funds and votes as much if not more than Obama. In that context it can be said that the Zionization of American politics has been completed.
     Can it ever be ended? Yes if enough Americans insist that their politicians be accountable to those who elect them and not the big money special interest lobbies.  
     At the time of writing the signs are that Obama will get a second term by default, this because no Republican challenger is credible to enough Americans. If that is the outcome of November’s election, probably a majority of Americans will be very far from happy with the way their electoral system operates; and that discontent might just be enough to cause them to demand an end to the corruption of the lobby system.
     My hope for 2013 and beyond is that they will. (Could it be that Rocky Anderson’s time will come?)




Friday, January 6, 2012

In which I call for the Taliban to invade Europe



An open letter to Mullah Omar

Dear Mullah Omar,

As-salaamu alaikum and a top o' the marnin' to ye!

(That's a traditional Irish Muslim greeting - I don't imagine you use it much in Afghanistan.)

Anyway, I thought I'd write to ask how you were getting along, and whether you might be able to take some time off from your busy jihad-ing in Afghanistan to invade, occupy, and liberate Europe.

Europe needs liberating a lot more than Afghanistan ever did. Here are some of the reasons:

*Europe is a failed state. The Euro is crashing and the EU will soon follow. If Europe breaks up into a bunch of feuding mini-states, it could cause serious global instability - possibly even a world war.  In fact, I think I remember that already happening once or twice.

*Europe is harboring terrorists. The US-NATO high command that slaughtered thousands of innocent civilians during Operation Gladio is still at large, protected by European governments. And let's not forget the terrorists who've been conspiring to bomb innocent countries including Iraq, Libya, Palestine, and your own Afghanistan.

*Europe is consuming large amounts of heroin, thereby subsidizing the criminals in Afghanistan who grow it. As part of the Taliban's "war on drugs," why not cut the problem off at the source - the demand side - by taking over Europe and putting an end to drug abuse, in the same way you so successfully put an end to opium production right before you got invaded?

*And, most important of all, you need to liberate European women from the forced prostitution of the "free market." Take a look at this story from today's London Telegraph:

'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'


By Clare Chapman

   A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year... (FULL STORY)
 
The so-called "women's liberation" movement, invented by the Rockefellers as a means of destroying the family, has reached its apotheosis in Germany; just as the "sexual revolution" has reached its apotheosis in the new US military code legalizing bestiality.

Obviously you "radical Muslim fundamentalists" who've been ranting about Western decadence are guilty of serious understatement. To atone for all those years of understatement, please invade us, occupy us, and liberate us. Get our women out of the whorehouses of the "free market" and back into the protective embraces of their homes and families.

I know some will argue that invading someone else's country to force your ways on them isn't right. But since the West did it to you first - many times, in fact - I'd say you owe us one.

In eager anticipation of your forthcoming invasion, occupation, and liberation

I remain, yrs truly

Dr. Kevin Barrett

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Senate declares US bestial military dictatorship



2012 is shaping up to be a heck of a year for the military.

On December 31, 2011, Obama signed the NDAA, codifying into law for the first time in American history that the military can imprison citizens or non-citizens indefinitely, inside or outside the United States, without charges or trial.    (Source: American Civil Liberties Union)

This obscene bill was the work of the US Senate. Every Senator who voted for it needs to be tried for treason, convicted, and hanged by the neck until dead. The President who signed it, with reservations, should get off with a lighter sentence. Like maybe a firing squad - or if we're feeling really merciful, a lethal injection.

But until that happens, I figure I'll just make the best of the situation. A couple of weeks ago, as my readers know, I turned myself in for indefinite military detention. I figured it would be kind of cool to have a Marine Corps marching band playing "Halls of Montezuma" as they kicked in my door and dragged me off to a sparkly-new Haliburton detention camp.

But now I'm rescinding my offer. In another email to DHS,* I have explained why: I don't want to be indefinitely detained by a bunch of sheep-schtuppers.

For the Senate, in its infinite wisdom, not only has unleashed the military against dissidents - but also against household pets:

Senate Repeals Bans on Sodomy and Bestiality in the Military
The U.S. Senate voted Thursday to approve a defense authorization bill which included a provision that not only repealed the military ban on sodomy, but also repealed the ban on having sex with animals — or bestiality.

I wonder which Senator wrote that part of the bill.

I wonder what kind of blackmail videos the Mossad has on that Senator.

I wonder whether that Senator's preference is for birds, mammals, amphibians, insects, or reptiles. (My guess would be reptiles...with giant cockroaches a close second.)

I realize the US Senate is full of the sickest and most corrupt people on God's green earth. I realize these guys wallow with pigs and other less hygienic creatures on a daily basis. I'm a tolerant guy - I don't waste my time worrying about who's screwing who, or what.

But when US Senators decide to enforce their predilection for having sex with animals on our brave men and women in uniform, that's where I draw the line.

When the US Senate sends the military into the US heartland to "disappear" citizens into concentration camps - AND WHILE THEY'RE AT IT, TO RAPE OUR HOUSEHOLD PETS, and for all we know the rabbits and squirrels and other innocent animals in our neighborhoods - I say it's time to rise up in revolt.

So I have rescinded my offer to be indefinitely detained. And I have informed DHS that I will be purchasing the highest-power weapons legally available, stocking up on ammunition, and getting ready to defend the dogs and cats and rabbits and squirrels of my neighborhood against the threat of rape by uniformed perverts sent by the traitors in the Senate.

Though frankly, I'd rather use my guns on those treasonous, animal-raping Senators.

So listen up, Senators: If I ever catch any one of you in the act of screwing a helpless, innocent animal, I'll blow your filthy head clean off.

And as for that little matter of treason...well, we'll deal with that when the time comes.

* * *

The letter below was sent to the Department of Homeland Security via the form at http://www.dhs.gov/xutil/contactus.shtm

Dear DHS,

I am hereby rescinding my offer to be indefinitely detained by the US military under NDAA.  While it is one thing for US troops to violate their oaths to the Constitution by disappearing US citizens without charges, it is quite another thing if the troops in question are serial animal rapists (like the Senators who voted for NDAA).

I do not wish to be indefinitely detained by people who have sex with pigs, monkeys, monitor lizards, giant cockroaches, or other animals.

If you have already sent a Marine platoon full of perverts to detain me, please contact them immediately and rescind my detention orders.

Sincerely,

Dr. Kevin Barrett

PS  I understand that you bloodsucking imbeciles and parasites at DHS probably also screw animals, having nothing else to do all day, given that 9/11 was an inside job and the "terror threat" is so statistically insignificant as to be meaningless. If so, I urge you to put down that tortoise, think hard about what you are doing, and consider resigning and getting a real job.