Since I'm the local Muslim Islamic studies expert who works for free, I get asked a lot of questions. This week, people brainwashed by Zionist media are asking: "Why do those crazy Muslims riot every time someone insults Islam?" For example, a Facebook friend asks:
The NY Times article's theme is: "He was killed because he 'went native.'" On the surface, the article suggests that "going native" and insisting on hanging out with Arabs, rather than hiding behind the guarded walls of the embassy, was Stevens' downfall. But this is classic Straussian, neocon-Zionist doublespeak: One message for the naive readers ("he was killed because he was too trusting") which subliminally brainwashes those naive readers into thinking "I guess it's dangerous to trust Arabs"; and a second message for our-fellow-Straussians-in-the-know: "We Zionists killed him because he was an Arab-loving, Muslim-loving scumbag.")
|Subtext: "He was killed because he was a pro-Isam Arab-lover"|
The article is filled with clues supporting this interpretation. For example, we learn about Stevens' "affection for Arab culture and street life, whether in Syria, Libya or the Palestinian territories..." OMG! AFFECTION for Palestinians!! We all know that for Zionists, Palestinians are jackals, venomous reptiles, fit only for extermination. (The article's subtext suggests that those Arab-Muslim snakes finally bit the handler who loved them.)
The NY Times article admits that the official "killed by Islamic radicals" narrative is questionable:
"Precisely what happened the night he was killed is unclear. But for an
American ambassador to have so little security on the anniversary of
Sept. 11, especially in a part of Libya known for its radicalism, is
bound to raise questions..."
We learn that Stevens “was a different kind of American diplomat, he really was” in his closeness to the Arab people he lived among (who of course have no use for Israel and Zionism). We learn that he was highly unusual in his openness to the Palestinian/Arab view that Zionism is evil and doomed:
"American diplomats, given a presentation on the Israeli settlements by
the Palestinians, often responded with exasperation, Ms. Buttu said,
complaining that the Palestinians 'didn’t understand how much we do for
you behind the scenes with the Israelis.' But Mr. Stevens was different,
she said. 'He would say, ‘Tell me more. Tell me more of what America
can do to help and why.’ ”
We also learn that Stevens was “very much in the tradition of old-school Americans" in the Middle East from the pre-Zionist era. In those days, Americans and Middle Easterners were the best of friends. Then along came Zionism and the Palestinian genocide, and the Zionists took over America and purged the US government of anyone who doesn't love Israel and hate Arabs and Islam. The murder of Ambassador Stevens is a message that Americans who try to go back to the pre-Zionist outlook, when Americans were the best friends of Arabs and Muslims, will be slaughtered.
The NY Times also informs us: "Roya Hakakian, an Iranian-born writer who met him then, said that 'he
displayed the quintessential sunny innocence of Americans.'” The subtext: He was so innocent he thought he could be a friend of Arabs and Muslims, and be open to their anti-Zionist views, without running the risk of being murdered by Zionists.
The Times article's last line is: "At the end, those very forces whose influence he thought would be curbed had claimed his life." Surface meaning: The word "forces" refers to radical Islamists. The esoteric meaning for Straussian Zionists: "forces" refers to Zionist forces - his real killers.
Leo Strauss taught his disciples - who by now include all of the hardcore Zionist neocons - to write and act this way: Lie and kill, and keep your team members informed of what you're doing by putting all of your public writing in doublespeak: A surface message for brainwashing the stupid masses, and beneath that, the nasty truth, which only your fellow neocons are likely to decipher. It should not surprise us that the New York Times, the Zionist paper of record, has published an article in neocon doublespeak all but confessing to the Zionist murder of Ambassador Stevens.
Labels: ambassador stevens, innocence of muslims, Israel, Leo Strauss, libya, neocons, New York Times, straussians, Zionism, Zionists