to Asia Times analyst Pepe Escobar,
Egypt's new president Mohammed
Morsi has “started to move more boldly against the army after an attack
by militants in Sinai that killed 16 border guards.”
To say that the Egyptian president is “moving boldly” is an
understatement. Last Sunday, President Morsi fired the chiefs of Egypt's
navy, air force, and air defense forces, along with the defense
minister and army chief of staff. All of the fired military leaders were
closely associated with the defunct Mubarak regime.
In public, President Morsi claimed that he was firing
the military officials for incompetence. Like John F. Kennedy in the
wake of the Bay of Pigs fiasco, who used the failed operation's
“incompetence” as an excuse to fire CIA spook-meister Allan Dulles,
Egypt's president appears to have won his battle with the military on
the battlefield of public opinion.
But like JFK, who did not tell the world the full truth about the
CIA's and military's attempt to hoodwink him into invading Cuba,
President Morsi may not yet be telling the whole truth about what really
happened in Sinai and why he really fired his military leadership.
Egypt's top military officials, especially those closest to Mubarak,
were notorious for their collaboration with Israel's Mossad in
arranging false flag terror attacks designed to be blamed on “radical
Muslims.” The attack in the Sinai, which killed sixteen Egyptian border
guards, may have been such a false flag.
Whenever a spectacular, widely-reported terrorist attack occurs, the
first question that must be asked is cui bono, or “who gains”? Israel's
Ha’aretz correspondent Akiva Eldar said of the Sinai attack: “The
Israelis are in a way quite happy that the Egyptians have learnt their
lesson, that they have to listen to us, and have had to pay the price.”
In other words, the only party with anything obvious to gain from the
Sinai attack was Israel, which wanted to punish Egypt for starting to
open up its borders with Gaza.
While the attack was publicly attributed to Salafi jihadists, its
extreme professionalism suggests that it must have had a state sponsor.
As Dr. Ashraf Ezzat
wrote in Veterans Today:
“Regardless of how the brainwashed jihadists view it, this terrorist
operation only benefits Israel. And in fact, some Egyptian analysts
have strong doubts as to the role of Israel in this terrorist operation
and how it had been anticipated by the Israeli intelligence only two
“What are the chances for two armed vehicles haphazardly storming
the Israeli borders of surviving the attack, let alone achieve anything.
Were the assailants not aware that they would be spotted on the
Israelis’ radar the moment they crossed the line and stepped into the
Israeli side of the borders? … Or were they assured otherwise?”
The Mubarak cronies running Egypt's military were notorious for
their collaboration with Israel in similar false flag operations. As I
wrote in the immediate aftermath of the Egyptian Revolution:
“One of the biggest sparks that set off the Egyptian revolution was blacked out of the US media.
“That spark was widespread anger that Mubarak's regime collaborated
with the Israeli Mossad to bomb a Coptic church in Alexandria on New
Years’ Eve - and blame it on Muslims. The whole Middle East saw right
through it immediately, and the Egyptian people's disgust was a big part
of what led them to overthrow Mubarak.”
President Morsi is fortunate that the Egyptian people
understand that Mubarak's military and their Zionist friends were behind
much of the “radical Islamic terrorism” that afflicted Egypt during the
Mubarak era. The majority of the Egyptian people, unlike most
Americans, understand false flag terrorism all too well, because they
have suffered so much from it.
A Western poll taken in Egypt showed that 72% of Egyptians do not
believe that al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks in America.
In this, they are in complete agreement with Egypt's leading public
intellectual, Mohammed Heikal, who said in October 2001: “Bin Laden has
been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored
and al-Qaeda has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani
intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not
have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of
organization and sophistication.”
President Morsi, for his part, may be following in the footsteps of
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by publicly opposing false flag
terrorism and standing up for 9/11 truth. Like Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro
of Cuba, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and former Italian President
Cossiga, Egypt's new president has publicly stated that he does not believe the official story of 9/11
Additionally, President Morsi publicly supports the movement to free
Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called "blind Sheikh," who was falsely blamed
for the mobbed-up New York FBI office's bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993
. (The FBI also orchestrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing,
according to convicted bomber Terry Nichols.)
With Iran's president demanding 9/11 truth and fighting off Mossad
terrorism, and the democratic elements of Turkey's leadership surviving
such false flag terror plots as Sledgehammer and Ergenekon, will Egypt's
President Morsi join in an eventual regional alliance against
Zionist-assisted false flag terror? By firing some of Egypt's leading
Mossad-assisted false flag terrorists last Sunday, he may have taken a
significant step in that direction.