The US government officially admits that the 9/11-follow-up anthrax mailings were a false-flag attack, originating from the US military-intelligence community, designed to demonize Muslims.
How long before they admit that 9/11, the other phase of the same event, was equally false-flag?
Barry Kissin, expert on the anthrax aspect of the 9/11-anthrax event, will be my guest on Truth Jihad Radio next Monday, October 17th, along with former BBC lead Mideast correspondent Alan Hart.
Barry writes:
A very real breakthrough occurred Monday on the front page of the NY Times. See
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/science/10anthrax.html
The comment on this article I posted at nytimes.com was as follows:
Bingo! "If Dr. Ivins did not make the powder, one conceivable source might be classified government research on anthrax, carried out for years by the military and the Central Intelligence Agency."
This theme is developed further in the paper by the three scientists that is the focus of this article: "[T]he most likely sites of production of the letter anthrax are laboratories that work with dry spores: Battelle, Dugway, and DRES. Battelle, for example, is well-known for its aerosol study capabilities ... There is no evidence that relevant samples were ever collected at Dugway, Battelle or other potentially suspect sites."
The cover-up of military-industrial-intelligence involvement is not only the work of the Bush Administration. The national security complex now dictates to the Obama administration. Witness that on March 15, 2011, the Obama administration announced it would oppose any reopening of Amerithrax because a reopening would "unfairly cast doubt on [the FBI's] conclusions"!
For an outline of the contours of the cover-up, see memo at
http://www.fredericknewspost.com/media/pdfs/FortAnthrax.pdfLabels: 9/11, Alan Hart, amerithrax, anthrax, barry kissin, batelle, CIA, false-flag, inside job, New York Times
